BRK Props., Inc. v. Wagner Ziv Plumbing & Heating Corp.
| Decision Date | 15 November 2011 |
| Parties | BRK PROPERTIES, INC., et al., appellants, v. WAGNER ZIV PLUMBING & HEATING CORP., respondent, et al., defendants. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Ginsburg & Misk, Queens Village, N.Y. (Gerard N. Misk of counsel), for appellants.
Farley & Kessler, P.C., Jericho, N.Y. (Cary D. Kessler, Susan R. Nudelman, and Richard L. Farley of counsel), for respondent.
PETER B. SKELOS, J.P., RUTH C. BALKIN, JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, and PLUMMER E. LOTT, JJ.
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kitzes, J.), entered June 29, 2010, as, after a nonjury trial, is in favor of the defendant Wagner Ziv Plumbing & Heating Corp. and against them on its counterclaim for an account stated in the principal sum of $59,000.
ORDERED that the judgment is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof in favor of the defendant Wagner Ziv Plumbing & Heating Corp. on its counterclaim for an account stated insofar as it is against the plaintiffs Michele Cohen, Inc., and Nat Holding Corp. in the sum of $59,000 and substituting therefor a provision dismissing that counterclaim insofar as asserted against those plaintiffs; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
In 2002 the plaintiffs hired the defendant Wagner Ziv Plumbing & Heating Corp. (hereinafter Wagner Ziv) to perform plumbing work on various buildings they owned. After various disputes arose with respect to the work performed and the payment allegedly due for that work, the plaintiffs commenced this action, seeking to recover damages, inter alia, for breach of contract. Wagner Ziv asserted counterclaims, seeking to recover damages based on breach of contract, an account stated, and quantum meruit. After a nonjury trial, the Supreme Court found that the writing relied on by the parties was so cursory and vague as not to be an enforceable contract. The Supreme Court found, however, in favor of Wagner Ziv on its counterclaim for an account stated, and a judgment was entered dismissing the complaint, and awarding Wagner Ziv damages in the principal sum of $59,000 on that counterclaim. The plaintiffs appeal from so much of the judgment as awarded Wagner Ziv damages on that counterclaim.
“[A]n account stated is an agreement between parties to an account based upon prior transactions between them with respect to the correctness of the account items and balance due ... By retaining billing statements and failing to...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
World Ambulette Transp., Inc. v. Kwan Haeng Lee
...witnesses’ " ( Quadrozzi v. Estate of Quadrozzi , 99 A.D.3d 688, 691, 952 N.Y.S.2d 74, quoting BRK Props., Inc. v. Wagner Ziv Plumbing & Heating Corp. , 89 A.D.3d 883, 884, 933 N.Y.S.2d 99 ; see Northern Westchester Professional Park Assoc. v. Town of Bedford , 60 N.Y.2d 492, 499, 470 N.Y.S......
-
Trimarco v. Data Treasury Corp.
...the witnesses' " (Quadrozzi v. Estate of Quadrozzi, 99 A.D.3d 688, 691, 952 N.Y.S.2d 74, quoting BRK Props., Inc. v. Wagner Ziv Plumbing & Heating Corp., 89 A.D.3d 883, 884, 933 N.Y.S.2d 99 ; see Northern Westchester Professional Park Assoc. v. Town of Bedford, 60 N.Y.2d 492, 499, 470 N.Y.S......
-
Nelson & Pope Eng'rs & Land Surveyors, PLLC v. Pinewood Dev. Corp.
...receiving the bill implies that he or she agrees with the sender regarding the amount owed ( BRK Props., Inc. v. Wagner Ziv Plumbing & Heating Corp., 89 AD3d 883, 933 N.Y.S.2d 99 [2d Dept 2011] ).However, a key element of a prima facie account-stated claim is proper evidence that the plaint......
-
Clean Earth of N. Jersey, Inc. v. Northcoast Maint. Corp.
...Inc. v. Cooper, 102 A.D.3d 645, 646, 961 N.Y.S.2d 170 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see BRK Props., Inc. v. Wagner Ziv Plumbing & Heating Corp., 89 A.D.3d 883, 884, 933 N.Y.S.2d 99 ). “An agreement may be implied where a defendant retains bills without objecting to them within a reaso......