Brooker v. William H. Thompson Trust Co.
Decision Date | 06 December 1913 |
Citation | 254 Mo. 125,162 S.W. 187 |
Parties | BROOKER v. WILLIAM H. THOMPSON TRUST CO. et al. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
By an agreement between the promoter of a corporation, a syndicate, the members of which were to subscribe for a part of the stock, and a bank which financed the organization of the corporation, the promoter was to receive a profit of $500,000 on property on which he held options, and which was to be transferred to the corporation, such bonus to be divided between him and the members of such syndicate. The corporation was formed and the board of directors, consisting of the promoter, the members of the syndicate, and one or two other stockholders associated with them, voted to purchase such property at such a price as allowed for such bonus. The corporation had a capital stock of $1,500,000, but by the agreement mentioned the stock was to be paid for at $150 a share, thus creating a surplus of $750,000, and the stock issued as the bonus represented a part of this surplus. All of those owning stock when such bonus was voted knew thereof, and were interested therein, either by themselves or through their representatives, except a brokerage company which subscribed for stock for the purpose of reselling it. The president of such brokerage company agreed to subscribe for the stock, and the secretary by direction of the president signed the subscription therefor, noting at the time that the transaction purported to be a purchase from the promoter and not an original subscription, and also noting a reference to the underwriting agreement mentioned purporting to be, but which he testified was not, attached. Held, that the brokerage company, having the means of knowledge before it, had notice of the issuance of such stock as a bonus, in view of the rule that when a written contract refers to another instrument such other instrument is a part of the contract, and hence such stock having been issued with the knowledge of all the stockholders, one who purchased stock from the brokerage company could not attack such issuance on behalf of the corporation.
Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court; Wm. M. Kinsey, Judge.
Action by August E. Brooker against the William H. Thompson Trust Company and others. From a judgment dismissing the bill, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.
This is a suit by plaintiff, a stockholder of the Title Guaranty Company, by which that company is impleaded with the parties to a contract which they called an underwriting agreement for financing the organization and capitalization of the corporation. Its object is to secure the restoration to the corporation for the benefit of its stockholders of the sum of $500,000, paid them from the capital of the corporation under the provisions of the contract already referred to, which is as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Zeitinger v. Annuity Realty Co.
...it was the duty of the Syndicate to preserve and protect it. 26 R.C.L. 1281; In re Kline, 32 A.L.R. 926, 280 Pa. St. 41; Brooker v. Trust Co., 254 Mo. 125. (d) The Syndicate could not lawfully take advantage of the bankruptcy situation and permit those in privity with it to take over, witho......
-
Zeitinger v. Annuity Realty Co.
... ... Syndicate in writing, was never delivered, but remained in ... trust with the Syndicate, and the property is still impressed ... with this ... C. L. 1281; In re ... Kline, 32 A. L. R. 926, 280 Pa. St. 41; Brooker v ... Trust Co., 254 Mo. 125. (d) The Syndicate could not ... lawfully ... Jackson, 240 Mo. 310; Vorlander v ... Keyes, 1 F.2d 67; Thompson v. Hayes, 11 F.2d ... 244; 26 R. C. L. 1280. (h) The Syndicate managers, ... ...
-
Loud v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.
... ... similar to that under review has already been passed upon ... adversely by this court. Brooker v. Trust Co., 254 ... Mo. 125. (e) A sale by four trustees under a will indirectly ... to two of ... Davidson, 89 Mo. 445; Keokuk Packet Co ... v. Davidson, 95 Mo. 467; Brooker v. Thompson Trust ... Co., 254 Mo. 125; Proctor v. Farrar, 213 S.W ... 469. (b) A trustee is not entitled ... Walker talked to C. B. Macdonald, Goldman, Sachs & Company, ... and William Salomen & Company, investment bankers and dealers ... in securities, but found "the reaction was ... ...
-
Hyde Park Amusement Co. v. Mogler
... ... Kaimann, William S. Kaimann, Mildred H. Kaimann, Arline J. Kaimann, and Kaimann Amusement ... (Perm. Ed.), ... sec. 918; Winger v. Chicago City Bank & Trust Co., ... 394 Ill. 94, 67 N.E.2d 265; Meinhard v. Salmon, 249 ... N.Y ... v ... Forslund, 225 Mo.App. 262, 29 S.W.2d 165, 1. c. 169; ... Brooker v. Thompson Trust Co., 254 Mo. 125, 162 S.W ... 187; Hill et al. v ... ...