Brooks v. General Elec. Credit Corp.

• Decision Date: 07 March 1978
• Docket Number: No. 55216,No. 2,55216,2
• Citation: 145 Ga.App. 407,243 S.E.2d 635
• Parties: C. C. BROOKS v. GENERAL ELECTRIC CREDIT CORPORATION of Georgia
• Court: Georgia Court of Appeals

Page 635

243 S.E.2d 635

145 Ga.App. 407

C. C. BROOKS v. GENERAL ELECTRIC CREDIT CORPORATION of Georgia.

No. 55216.

Court of Appeals of Georgia,Division No. 2.

March 7, 1978.

Rehearing Denied March 23, 1978.

Redfern, Butler & Morgan, Rex M. Lamb, III, Atlanta, for appellant.

Harmon, Smith & Bridges, Nolan B. Harmon, Tyron M. Bridges, Ginger C. Jones, Archer D. Smith, III, Atlanta, for appellee.

McMURRAY, Judge.

Plaintiff, C. C. Brooks, brought this action to recover attorney fees paid under protest (a reservation of rights as to payment of same) to defendant General Electric Credit Corporation of Georgia. The attorney fees arose in connection with the collection of certain indebtedness of the plaintiff to defendant which indebtedness was evidenced by an agreement providing for reasonable attorney fees actually incurred by defendant in the enforcement of its agreements with plaintiff as guarantor of the indebtedness of Bryant Atlanta Corporation.

Plaintiff made a motion for summary judgment. At the hearing of that motion it was stipulated that there was no dispute as to the material facts and that only an issue of law remained. The sole issue is whether the notices sent to plaintiff and his attorney and to Bryant Atlanta Corporation regarding the obligation to pay attorney fees were sufficient to comply with the requirements of Georgia Code § 20-506(c), as amended (Ga.L.1946, pp. 761, 766; 1953, pp. 545, 546; 1968, p. 317). The court denied plaintiff's motion, and no further issue of law or fact remaining in the case, the court ordered that judgment be granted for the defendant. Plaintiff appeals. Held:

The failure to meet the exact statutory requirements of Code Ann. § 20-506(c), supra, will result in disallowance of such attorney fees. The requirements include, "stating that the provisions relative to payment of attorney fees appearing in the instrument will be enforced." Farnan v. National Bank of Georgia, 142 Ga.App. 777, 779, 236 S.E.2d 923, 925. As there was no reference to provisions in any instrument relative to payment of attorney fees, the letters sent to plaintiff and his attorney and to Bryant Atlanta Corporation did not meet this requirement. See Walton v. Johnson, 213 Ga. 108, 111(3), 97 S.E.2d 310; Sockwell v. Pettus, 139 Ga.App. 311(2), 228 S.E.2d 343; Adair Realty & Loan Company v. Williams Brothers Lumber Company, 112 Ga.App 16, 17, 143 S.E.2d 577; Turk's Memorial Chapel, Inc. v. Toccoa Casket Company, 134 Ga.App. 71, 213...