Brooks v. State
| Decision Date | 12 January 2007 |
| Docket Number | No. SC06-1266.,SC06-1266. |
| Citation | 948 So.2d 758 |
| Parties | BROOKS v. STATE. |
| Court | Florida Supreme Court |
To continue reading
Request your trial
5 cases
-
Brooks v. State
...standard. Id. We have jurisdiction to resolve the conflict and granted review. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.; Brooks v. State, 948 So.2d 758 (Fla.2007) (granting review). We agree with the Fourth Below, we first review our decision in Anderson. Next, we discuss the facts of this case a......
-
Lane v. State
... ... [961 So.2d 995] ... No appearance required for appellee ... PER CURIAM ... The lower court properly denied appellant's rule 3.800(a) motion by applying the "could-have-been-imposed" harmless error test. Brooks v. State, 930 So.2d 835 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (en banc), review granted, 948 So.2d 758 (Fla.2007). As we did in Ghanem v. State, 947 So.2d 1252 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007), we affirm without prejudice to appellant seeking relief in the lower court pursuant to rule 3.850, within the time remaining under that ... ...
-
Macool v. State, 5D07-2075.
... ... Lubet, Judge ... Hanna Macool, Monticello, pro se ... No Appearance for Appellee ... PER CURIAM ... AFFIRMED. See Montoya v. State, 943 So.2d 253 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006); Brooks" v. State, 930 So.2d 835 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006), review granted, 948 So.2d 758 (Fla.2007) ... \xC2" ... ...
-
Taylor v. State
... ... Contrary to the state's argument on appeal, the alleged scoresheet errors could not be raised in a rule 3.800(a) motion, because the sentence Taylor received could have been imposed notwithstanding the alleged errors. See Brooks v. State, 930 So.2d 835 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006), rev. granted, 948 So.2d 758 (Fla.2007) ... When Taylor entered an open plea in this case, the trial judge stated that he did not intend to sentence him above the lowest permissible sentence on the scoresheet. The record does not show ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results