Brooks v. State
| Decision Date | 18 February 1997 |
| Docket Number | No. 24578,24578 |
| Citation | 481 S.E.2d 712,325 S.C. 269 |
| Court | South Carolina Supreme Court |
| Parties | Darrell S. BROOKS, Respondent, v. STATE of South Carolina, Petitioner. |
Assistant Appellate Defender Lisa Gregory, of S.C. Office of Appellate Defense, Columbia, for respondent.
Respondent pled guilty to second degree burglary, grand larceny, and financial transaction card fraud and was sentenced, respectively, to two ten year prison terms and a one
year prison term. He filed an application for post-conviction relief (PCR). The PCR judge granted PCR, finding respondent's plea was involuntary because the trial judge did not sentence him to seven years' imprisonment in accordance with the terms of his negotiated plea. The Court granted certiorari to review the decision of the PCR judge. We reverse.
Was respondent's guilty plea rendered involuntary because the trial judge failed to sentence him in accordance with the terms of his negotiated plea?
While on probation, respondent pled guilty to the above charges. The trial judge informed respondent he could receive a one year sentence for financial transaction card fraud, a fifteen year sentence for second degree burglary, and a ten year sentence for grand larceny, for a total of 26 years' imprisonment. Respondent's counsel informed the trial judge the solicitor's office had agreed to a seven year sentence. As noted above, the trial judge sentenced respondent to ten years' imprisonment.
At the PCR hearing, respondent testified he spoke with counsel before his plea and "we was going to try for ten years but five years would be served and five years on probation." He stated he did not have any understanding in regard to a seven year sentence. Respondent admitted he did not want to go to trial, but wanted to plead guilty and receive a shorter sentence.
Counsel testified he explained the charges, defenses, and sentence exposure to respondent, and respondent appeared to understand. Counsel stated from almost the beginning respondent indicated he wanted to plead guilty; respondent never indicated he wanted a jury trial.
Counsel testified he negotiated a plea with the State and the State agreed to allow respondent to serve the remaining seven years on his prior conviction and run the current sentences concurrently. Counsel testified he believed he advised respondent of the plea agreement and respondent understood. He further stated he believed respondent entered his plea based on the negotiated seven year sentence. Counsel explained he did not hear from respondent after the guilty plea.
A trial judge is allowed broad discretion in sentencing within statutory limits. Garrett v. State, 320 S.C. 353, 465 S.E.2d 349 (1995); State v. Sidell, 262 S.C. 397, 205 S.E.2d 2 (1974). A sentence is not excessive if it is within statutory limitations and there are no facts supporting an allegation of prejudice against a defendant. Garrett, supra. A court is not required to accept a plea agreement reached by the State and the defendant. State v. Rosier, 312 S.C. 145, 439 S.E.2d 307 (Ct.App.1993).
There is no evidence resp...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Brouwer
...AUTHORITY AS TO SENTENCING A trial judge is allowed broad discretion in sentencing within statutory limits. Brooks v. State, 325 S.C. 269, 481 S.E.2d 712 (1997); Garrett v. State, 320 S.C. 353, 465 S.E.2d 349 (1995). See also State v. Franklin, 267 S.C. 240, 226 S.E.2d 896 (1976)(trial judg......
-
Johnson v. Stevenson
...court acted within its discretion to impose a harsher sentence on Petitioner than his co-defendant received. See Brooks v. State, 481 S.E.2d 712, 713 (S.C. 1997) (noting that the circuit court has broad discretion to sentence within the statutory limits, and that if a sentence is within the......
-
Roddy v. State, 25075.
...have been made." Wolfe, 326 S.C. at 165,485 S.E.2d at 371. The facts of the instant case are analogous to the facts in Brooks v. State, 325 S.C. 269, 481 S.E.2d 712 (1997) and Holland v. State, 322 S.C. 111, 470 S.E.2d 378 (1996). In both cases we reversed the PCR court because the evidence......
-
State v. Rikard, 4156.
...death results as twenty-five years imprisonment and fifteen years for felony DUI causing great bodily injury); Brooks v. State, 325 S.C. 269, 271, 481 S.E.2d 712, 713 (1997) ("A trial judge is allowed broad discretion in sentencing within statutory limits."). Thus, we find no error in the j......