Brooks v. State, 38753
| Decision Date | 29 June 1982 |
| Docket Number | No. 38753,38753 |
| Citation | 292 S.E.2d 694,249 Ga. 583 |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
| Parties | William Henry BROOKS v. The STATE. |
William M. Phillips, Ringgold, for William Henry Brooks.
David L. Lomenick, Jr., Dist. Atty., LaFayette, Michael J. Bowers, Atty. Gen., Atlanta, for the State.
The defendant was convicted of the murder of his common-law wife and sentenced to life imprisonment. His sole enumeration of error is that the trial court failed to charge, upon written request, the law of voluntary manslaughter.
The evidence at trial showed that the defendant and victim had been married for seven years. Approximately one month prior to her death, the victim filed for divorce. The defendant subsequently moved into a trailer about a block from the victim's house. According to the testimony of several witnesses, on numerous occasions the defendant publicly pled with the victim to reconcile with him which the victim adamantly refused to do. One witness testified the defendant vowed "he would see [the victim] dead before he'd let her get a divorce." This same witness testified that on the day of the victim's death, she was babysitting for the victim's children. Throughout the day, the defendant telephoned the victim's house, requesting to speak to the victim. When the victim returned from work, the defendant called again; this witness testified, however, that the victim refused to speak to him. The babysitter further testified that shortly thereafter she and the victim walked out of the house. The babysitter realized she had forgotten her medication and returned to the house to get it. When she emerged from the house she saw the defendant shooting the victim. This babysitter testified that the defendant then nudged the victim's body with his foot and stated, "You whore, you won't whore no more."
The victim's fourteen year old daughter testified that she watched from several feet away while the defendant approached the victim and opened fire on her. The victim's daughter testified that neither the defendant nor the victim spoke before the defendant shot.
A twelve year old friend of the victim's daughter testified that he was in the victim's house immediately prior to the shooting and heard the victim speak to the defendant over the telephone, calling the defendant by name. According to this witness, the victim told the defendant she did not have time to talk to him because "she was going on a hot date."
Bruce Hampton, who lived two houses away from the victim, testified that a week prior to the shooting, the defendant approached him and asked to borrow his .22 automatic rifle. The defendant explained that "one of the [victim's] boyfriends was bothering him"; the defendant returned the gun to Hampton the following day without further explanation. At trial Hampton testified that "about 15 or 20 minutes" before the shooting occurred the defendant borrowed his rifle again. Several minutes later, he testified, he heard the defendant and victim "hollering" at each other "in angry voices." He heard the defendant yell at the victim, "you won't whore around on me no more" and began firing. The defendant then attempted to return the rifle to Hampton, but Hampton refused to accept it.
Several neighbors testified that, following the shooting, the defendant appeared to be "a wild man." His eyes were "glazed over" and he was "beserk", screaming that "they were going to kill [him]."
A patrolman from the East Ridge Police Department testified that when he arrived to apprehend the defendant, he found the defendant in a "highly excited" state. The defendant spontaneously stated "I killed her ... she just drove me to it." The patrolman testified the defendant further stated that the victim had called him, "bragging about ... her sexual activities with another gentleman." A deputy sheriff testified that when he arrived on the scene, the defendant told him that he had gone to the victim's house with the intention of scaring her with the rifle but that when she began taunting him with a graphic description of her sexual activities with other men, he shot her.
Two other witnesses were permitted to testify that, on several occasions prior to the shooting, they had heard the victim publicly taunt the defendant about the specifics of her sexual activities with other men.
The medical examiner who performed the autopsy on the victim testified that she had been shot "a minimum of five" times.
(1) Code Ann. § 26-1102 provides, in part, "[a] person commits voluntary manslaughter when he causes the death of another human being, under circumstances...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Rodriguez-Nova v. State
...manslaughter in OCGA § 16–5–2(a). See Aguilar v. State, 240 Ga. 830, 833(4), 242 S.E.2d 620 (1978). See also Brooks v. State, 249 Ga. 583, 585–586, 292 S.E.2d 694 (1982). In that respect, the particular jury instruction of which Rodriguez–Nova complains was implicit in the statutory volunta......
-
Brown v. State, S98A1875.
...to show the elements of passion and provocation necessary to reduce the homicide from murder to manslaughter. See Brooks v. State, 249 Ga. 583, 292 S.E.2d 694 (1982). It is undisputed that the alleged molestation occurred some months prior to the shooting. However, Brown stalked Clarkson pe......
-
Munn v. State
...where the killing is done solely on account of the indignation aroused by the use of opprobrious words." Brooks v. State , 249 Ga. 583, 586, 292 S.E.2d 694 (1982) (citation, punctuation and emphasis omitted). See also Jones v. State , 301 Ga. 1, 6 (2), 799 S.E.2d 196 (2017) (neither angry s......
-
Todd v. State
...can support a finding of voluntary manslaughter. See Strickland v. State, 257 Ga. 230, 231(2), 357 S.E.2d 85 (1987); Brooks v. State, 249 Ga. 583, 586, 292 S.E.2d 694 (1982). The language concerning "provocation by words alone" given in the jury instruction is correct. See Mack v. State, 27......