Brookshire v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.
Decision Date | 07 February 1933 |
Docket Number | No. 22362.,22362. |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Parties | BROOKSHIRE v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INS. CO. |
Appeal from Cape Girardeau Court of Common Pleas; O. A. Knehans, Judge.
"Not to be published in State Reports."
Action by W. A. Brookshire against Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. Judgment was rendered for plaintiff. From an order granting plaintiff a new trial, defendant appeals.
Affirmed and remanded.
Edgar & Banta, of Ironton, and Fordyce, White, Mayne & Williams, of St. Louis, for appellant.
Davis & Damron, of Fredericktown, for respondent.
This is an action to recover $937.50 for the deforcement of an attorney's lien. The trial, with a jury, resulted in a verdict and judgment for plaintiff for $100. From an order granting plaintiff a new trial, defendant appeals.
Prior to November, 1930, Emile F. McCall was in the employ of the St. Joseph Lead Company. He was insured by the defendant, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, in the sum of $3,750. The insurance was taken out and paid for by his employer, St. Joseph Lead Company, and is what is known as group insurance.
The insurance contract provides, so far as pertinent here, substantially as follows:
It appears that Emile F. McCall, while in the employ of the St. Joseph Lead Company, contracted tuberculosis. His employment with the St. Joseph Lead Company was terminated on November 15, 1930. On February 25, 1931, plaintiff, an attorney engaged in the practice of law at Farmington was employed by Emile F. McCall to represent him in his claim for total and permanent disability under his insurance contract. The employment was evidenced in writing, and provided for a contingent fee of 25 per cent. of whatever amount might be collected on the claim if collection was made without suit, and 40 per cent. of whatever amount might be collected in the event it should become necessary to file suit on the claim.
Pursuant to his employment, plaintiff wrote defendant at its New York office, informing defendant that the insured, according to his physician's diagnosis, was in an advanced stage of tuberculosis, and requesting defendant to furnish him with blanks upon which insured could make formal proofs for total and permanent disability benefits, and also stating the terms of his employment. After receiving from the defendant blanks for formal proofs, plaintiff made up the proofs and caused them to be properly signed and verified by the insured and his physician, and forwarded them to the defendant. Defendant objected to the validity of the claim on the ground that there was no showing that the insured was totally and permanently disabled before his employment ceased with the St. Joseph Lead Company. However, after extended correspondence between plaintiff and defendant, the claim was finally approved by defendant for total and permanent disability benefits on April 7, 1931, premiums being waived as of March 14, 1931, so that the first installment payment became due September 14, 1931.
The insured died on April 10, 1931. Pulmonary tuberculosis caused his death.
On April 17, 1931, insured's widow, the beneficiary, employed plaintiff to represent her, in her claim for total and permanent disability benefits due the insured, on the same percentage basis as was agreed upon in his employment by the insured. On April 18th plaintiff wrote defendant of his employment by Mrs. McCall, and sent with his letter affidavits proving the insured's death, and also a copy of his contract of employment by Mrs. McCall. This letter was mailed about 11 o'clock a. m. at Farmington. There was an outgoing mail at 2:30 p. m. The evidence for defendant shows that this letter was received by defendant at the New York office on April 21st.
On April 16th the St. Joseph Lead Company made out proofs of the death of the insured and forwarded the same to the defendant. These proofs were not signed by Mrs. McCall. So far as the evidence shows, these proofs were made out without her knowledge. Plaintiff testified that he knew nothing of the sending of these proofs at the time he made up and forwarded proofs of...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Nick v. Travelers Ins. Co.
... ... notice to him of cancellation was not necessary. Williams ... v. Sun Life Assur. Soc., 235 Mo.App. 741, 148 S.W.2d ... 112; Magee v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc., 62 N.D ... Prudential Ins. Co. of Amer., 161 S.W.2d 27; ... Crawford v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 167 S.W.2d ... 915; Miller v. Travelers Ins. Co., 17 A.2d 907; ... Duval v ... v. Tillman, 146 So. 393; Equitable Life Assur ... Soc. v. Florence, 171 S.E. 317; Brookshire v ... Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 56 S.W.2d 817; Sullivan ... v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins ... ...
-
Fenn v. Hart Dairy Co.
... ... attorney's lien statutes. Mills v. Metropolitan ... Street Ry. Co., 228 Mo. 118, 221 S.W. 1; Brookshire ... v. Met. fe Ins. Co. (Mo. App.), 56 S.W.2d 817; ... State ex rel. v. Roehrig, 8 S.W.2d ... depends upon the infant's estate and condition in life ... Articles purchased for or by an infant are not ... necessaries, ... ...
-
Clark v. Midwest Bakeries & Macaroni Mfg. Co.
... ... App.) 195 S.W.2d 902; Sec ... 13338, R. S. Mo., 1939; Brookshire v. Metropolitan Life ... Ins. Co., (Mo. App.) 56 S.W.2d 817; Gerritzen v ... ...
-
Fein v. Schwartz, 31772
...defendants, * * *.' The provisions of the statute for attorney's liens are remedial and are liberally construed. Brookshire v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., Mo.App., 56 S.W.2d 817, and cases cited therein. We said in Satterfield v. Southern Railway Company, Mo.App., 287 S.W.2d 395, l.c. 'So i......