Brown Exp. Co., Inc. v. Burns, 6237
Decision Date | 23 October 1980 |
Docket Number | No. 6237,6237 |
Citation | 608 S.W.2d 291 |
Parties | BROWN EXPRESS COMPANY, INC., Appellant, v. Glenn BURNS, Appellee. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Beverly Willis, J. Frank Kinsel, Jr., Naman, Howell, Smith, Lee & Muldrow, P. C., Waco, for appellant.
Sam R. Jones, George Shaffer, Shaffer & Jones, Waco, for appellee.
Plaintiff Glenn Burns filed this suit against defendant Brown Express Company, Inc., in McLennan County to recover for damages to plaintiff's tractor-trailer truck caused by a collision on Interstate Highway 35 in McLennan County between plaintiff's truck and a truck owned by defendant. Plaintiff alleged that defendant
Defendant filed its plea of privilege to have the case transferred to Bexar County, the county of its residence. The plea was controverted by plaintiff under the provisions of § 9a of article 1995, Vernon's Tex.Civ.St., which permits a suit for damages based upon the causal negligence of the defendant to be maintained in the county where the negligent act or omission occurred. After a hearing by the court without a jury, the plea of privilege was overruled. Defendant brought this appeal. We reverse the judgment.
Findings of fact and conclusions of law were not requested by the parties nor filed by the court. Accordingly, the presumption obtains that the court impliedly made all necessary fact findings in support of the judgment. Renfro Drug Co. v. Lewis, 149 Tex. 507, 235 S.W.2d 609, 613 (1950).
In its first point of error, defendant contends that the implied finding of an act or omission of negligence by defendant on the occasion of the accident is not supported by any evidence. In deciding this complaint, we must consider only the evidence and its inferences that support the finding and view them in the light most favorable to the finding. Freeman v. Texas Compensation Ins. Co., (Tex.1980) 603 S.W.2d 186, 191. When this is done, the evidence shows the following material facts: Plaintiff's driver was returning plaintiff's truck to the City of Waco from the City of San Antonio along Interstate Highway 35 at about 2:30 A.M. on November 7, 1979, when the motor failed a few miles south of Waco in McLennan County. The driver coasted the truck to a stop on the shoulder of the highway and properly and safely parked it there. After being unable to start the engine, the driver turned on the emergency flasher lights and the other lights on the truck, placed reflectors around the truck along the highway, and left the truck to go into Waco and secure help. While plaintiff's driver was gone, a truck owned by defendant and operated by defendant's driver collided with plaintiff's parked truck at...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Rodriguez v. Panther Expedited Servs., Inc.
...245, 255 (Tex. 1974); Lambert v. Gearhart-Owen Indus., 626 S.W.2d 845, 847 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1981, no writ); Brown Express Co. v. Burns, 608 S.W.2d 291, 293 (Tex. Civ. App.—Waco 1980, no writ). Even when viewed in the light most favorable to Rodriguez, the evidence he produced creat......
-
Jones v. Tarrant Utility Co.
...not include proof of any act of negligence by appellee, and injury or damage is not ipso facto evidence of negligence. Brown Exp. Co., Inc. v. Burns, 608 S.W.2d 291 (Tex.Civ.App.-Waco 1980, no The record also contains no explanation by appellants as to why they could not produce evidence of......
-
Lambert v. Gearhart-Owen Industries, Inc., GEARHART-OWEN
...in his pleadings that he intends to rely upon the doctrine. Mobil Chemical v. Bell, 517 S.W.2d 245, 254 (Tex.1974); Brown Express Co., Inc. v. Burns, 608 S.W.2d 291 (Tex.Civ.App.-Waco 1980, no writ). In the instant case, plaintiffs pleaded specific acts and omissions of negligence against t......
-
Prieto v. Val Verde Memorial Hosp.
...shut, and that a man sustained an injury." The occurrence of an accident is not of itself evidence of negligence. Brown Express Company, Inc. v. Burns, 608 S.W.2d 291, 293 (Tex.Civ.App.--Waco 1980, no writ) (and cases cited therein). In reviewing the evidence, we must indulge every inferenc......