Brown v. State
| Decision Date | 09 January 2012 |
| Docket Number | No. S11A1469.,S11A1469. |
| Citation | 290 Ga. 321,720 S.E.2d 617,12 FCDR 91 |
| Parties | BROWN v. The STATE. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Wilbert L. Brown, Nicholls, pro se.
Timothy Grady Vaughn, District Attorney, Lauren Shurling Finley, Assistant District Attorney, Samuel S. Olens, Attorney General, Paula Khristian Smith, Senior Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Appellant Wilbert Brown appeals from the trial court's denial of his motion for out-of-time appeal. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
On September 16, 1993, appellant entered negotiated pleas of guilty to charges of murder and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. Pursuant to the agreement, he was sentenced to life in prison on the murder charge and a concurrent five-year term in prison on the possession charge. On June 4, 2010, appellant filed a motion for out-of-time appeal which the trial court denied on December 16, 2010. This appeal followed.
1. It is well established that a criminal defendant has “ ‘no unqualified right to file a direct appeal from a judgment of conviction and sentence entered on a guilty plea,’ ” and “ ‘[a]n appeal will lie from a judgment entered on a guilty plea only if the issue on appeal can be resolved by facts appearing in the record.’ ” Barlow v. State, 282 Ga. 232, 233, 647 S.E.2d 46 (2007). “The ability to decide the appeal based on the existing record thus becomes the deciding factor in determining the availability of an out-of-time appeal when the defendant has pled guilty.” Grantham v. State, 267 Ga. 635, 481 S.E.2d 219 (1997). The denial of a motion for out-of-time appeal is a matter within the discretion of the trial court. A court's decision to deny such a motion will not be overturned absent an abuse of discretion. Moore v. State, 285 Ga. 855(1), 684 S.E.2d 605 (2009).
2. Appellant contends he was entitled to an out-of-time appeal because his indictment was void for failing to allege what instrument was used to shoot the victim. However, where an issue raised by a defendant in a motion for out-of-time appeal can be resolved against him based upon the existing record, there is no error in denying the motion. Brown v. State, 280 Ga. 658, 659, 631 S.E.2d 687 (2006). The indictment in this case alleges appellant did “with malice aforethought cause the death of Eric Patterson, a human being, by shooting him.” These allegations were sufficient to place appellant on notice that he was being charged with causing the death of the victim by shooting him with a firearm. See OCGA § 16–5–1(a); Morgan v. State, 275 Ga. 222(9), 564 S.E.2d 192 (2002). The indictment was not lacking an essential element of the crime of malice murder, and the court, therefore, did not err in denying the motion for out-of-time appeal on this ground. See Golden v. State, 299 Ga.App. 407, 407, 683 S.E.2d 618 (2009) ().
3. Similarly, appellant's claim that the indictment was void because the name of the grand jury foreman and the date of offense as to Count II were altered is not supported by the record. The indictment identifies “Norris E. Dow” as the grand jury foreman, and the indictment appears to be signed by “Norris E. Dow.” The prosecutor's handwritten date change in Count II of the indictment prior to its presentation to the grand jury did not render the indictment void. Compare Fleming v. State, 276 Ga.App. 491, 493–494, 623 S.E.2d 696 (2005). Again, because appellant's challenges to the indictment can be decided against him on the existing record, it was not an abuse of discretion to deny the motion for out-of-time appeal on these grounds.
4. Appellant's claim that he was entitled to an out-of-time direct appeal because the trial court failed to swear him in prior to his guilty plea can also be decided against him on the existing record. Even assuming an obligation to place a criminal defendant under oath before accepting a plea, a review of the plea hearing transcript establishes that no objection to appellant's unsworn testimony was made at the time the testimony was given. Appellant, therefore, waived any objection he may have had to the court's failure to place him under oath. See Sweeting v. State, 291 Ga.App. 693, 694–695, 662 S.E.2d 785 (2008) (...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Collier v. State
...837-840 (2), (4), 733 S.E.2d 266 (2012) ; Gibson v. State , 290 Ga. 516, 517 (2) (b), 722 S.E.2d 741 (2012) ; Brown v. State , 290 Ga. 321 (2), 322 (5), 720 S.E.2d 617 (2012) ; Upperman v. State , 288 Ga. 447, 448 (1), 705 S.E.2d 152 (2011) ; Smith v. State , 287 Ga. 391, 404-405 (4), 697 S......
-
Bennett v. State
...However, it is well settled that the failure to object to unsworn testimony waives the issue for appeal. See Brown v. State, 290 Ga. 321, 322(4), 720 S.E.2d 617 (2012) ; Chapman v. State, 257 Ga. 19, 20(3), 354 S.E.2d 149 (1987) ; Sweeting v. State, 291 Ga.App. 693, 694, 662 S.E.2d 785 (200......
-
Stephens v. State
...deficient, nor did any prejudice result.” Smith v. State, 287 Ga. 391, 403 n. 5, 697 S.E.2d 177 (2010). See also Brown v. State, 290 Ga. 321, 321, 720 S.E.2d 617 (2012) (“[W]here an issue raised by a defendant in a motion for out-of-time appeal can be resolved against him based upon the exi......
-
Harris v. State
...16. See generally Stephens, supra. 17.Id. at 839(2), 733 S.E.2d 266. 18. See generally id. at 840(4), 733 S.E.2d 266;Brown v. State, 290 Ga. 321(1), 720 S.E.2d 617 (2012); Ethridge v. State, 283 Ga.App. 289, 291, 641 S.E.2d 282 ...
-
Domestic Relations
...S.E.2d at 845; Coe v. Coe, 285 Ga. 863, 864-65, 684 S.E.2d 598, 600-01 (2009).101. 290 Ga. 354, 720 S.E.2d 614 (2012).102. Id. at 357, 720 S.E.2d at 617.103. Id. at 355, 720 S.E.2d at 615-16.104. Id. at 355, 720 S.E.2d at 616. 105. 290 Ga. 721, 725 S.E.2d 277 (2012).106. Id. at 722, 725 S.E......