Brown v. Bray
Decision Date | 03 July 1974 |
Docket Number | No. 44327,44327 |
Citation | 300 So.2d 668 |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Parties | Rodney BROWN, Appellant, v. Jayne A. BRAY, Appellee. |
John S. Burton, Plant City, for appellant.
Clifford Schott, Lakeland, for appellee.
This appeal raises the question whether F.S. Chapter 742, F.S.A., the state's bastardy statute, is facially constitutional, its validity having been passed upon favorably by the Circuit Court for Polk County, Florida. We affirm.
Appellant Rodney Brown contends the chapter is unconstitutional because it denies the father of a bastard child the rights the father of a legitimate child enjoys.
Appellant notes F.S. Section 61.13(2), F.S.A. provides for equal consideration as to father and mother in determining custody in Dissolution proceedings, but that Section 742.011 provides for exclusive relief to the mother in Bastardy proceedings, citing Pinkney v. Pinkney (Fla.App.1967), 198 So.2d 52. Pinkney was an action for damages against the father by his illegitimate daughter for the wrongful death of the mother and for having caused the daughter to be born illegitimate. The District Court held that absent express statutory authority, the illegitimate child was barred from recovering damages therefor. We disagree with that decision and overrule it under the rationale of Garner v. Ward (Fla.1971), 251 So.2d 252; Evans v. Atlantic Cement Company (Fla.App.1973), 272 So.2d 538, and Levy v. Louisiana (1968), 391 U.S. 68, 88 S.Ct. 1509, 20 L.Ed.2d 436.
In the absence of any Florida authority passing directly on the constitutionality of Chapter 742, Appellant relies on Stanley v. Illinois (1972), 405 U.S. 645, 92 S.Ct. 1208, 31 L.Ed.2d 551, which involved an attack on an Illinois statutory scheme providing for presumption of unfitness and denial of a fitness hearing for purposes of child custody of an unmarried father, although married and divorced parents and unmarried mothers were not so presumed and were entitled to such a hearing. Therein the Court found the statutory scheme violative of due process and equal protection and recognized that the interests of parent and child were more important than the procedural advantages of the statute.
F.S. Section 742.031, F.S.A. provides:
(Emphasis supplied.)
F.S. Section 742.06, F.S.A. provides:
'742.06 Same; jurisdiction retained for future orders.--The court shall retain jurisdiction of the cause for the purpose of entering such other and further...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Kendrick v. Everheart
...of child support obligations on either or both parents depending on their ability and other relevant circumstances. See Brown v. Bray, 300 So.2d 668 (Fla.1974). Thus, in protecting the welfare of minor children, chapter 742 serves an important state interest. And by providing a mother with ......
-
Moores v. Lucas
...action for wrongful life by illegitimates: Pinkney v. Pinkney, 198 So.2d 52 (Fla. 1st DCA 1967), overruled on other grounds, Brown v. Brown, 300 So.2d 668 (Fla.1974); Stills v. Gratton, 55 Cal.App.3d 698, 127 Cal.Rptr. 652 (1976); Zepeda v. Zepeda, 41 Ill.App.2d 240, 190 N.E.2d 849 (1963), ......
-
Brauch v. Shaw
...child upon a dissolution of marriage. See, e. g., Orezza v. Ramirez, 19 Ariz.App. 405, 410, 507 P.2d 1017, 1022 (1973); Brown v. Bray, 300 So.2d 668, 670 (Fla.1974); People ex rel. Irby v. Dubois, 41 Ill.App.3d 609, 614-15, 354 N.E.2d 562, 567 (1976); Marshall v. Stefanides, 17 Md.App. 364,......
-
People ex rel Irby v. Dubois, 63237
...such children to have rights of custody as would a father of legitimate children upon a dissolution of a marriage. (Brown v. Bray, Fla., 300 So.2d 668; Marshall v. Stefanides, 17 Md.App. 364, 302 A.2d 682; Orezza v. Ramirez, 19 Ariz.App. 405, 507 P.2d 1017; Sparks v. Phelps, Or.App., 540 P.......
-
Determination of parentage - unmarried parents
...as granted to fathers in dissolution of marriage, requiring the unmarried father to file a declaratory judgment action. [ Brown v. Bray , 300 So. 2d 668 (Fla1974)(a putative father who has shown a substantial interest in his illegitimate offspring may bring a declaratory judgment suit to ad......
-
Visitation centers: a solution without critics.
...v. Mize, 198 So. 2d 373 (Fla. 1st D.C.A. 1967); Collinsworth v. O'Connell, 508 So. 2d 744, 746 (Fla. 1st D.C.A. 1987); Brown v. Bray, 300 So. 2d 668, 669 (Fla. 1974); Stepp v. Stepp, 520 So. 2d 314 (Fla. 2d D.C.A. 1988); Kent v. Burdick, 573 So. 2d 61, 63-64 (Fla. 1st D.C.A. 1990). (5) FLA.......