Brown v. Brown, S99A1708.

Decision Date18 January 2000
Docket NumberNo. S99A1708.,S99A1708.
Citation525 S.E.2d 359,271 Ga. 887
PartiesBROWN v. BROWN.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Stephen N. Hollomon, Warner Robins, for appellant.

Fred I. Graham, Arthur H. Clarke, Jr., Warner Robins, for appellee.

CARLEY, Justice.

Appellee Sharon Brown filed suit for divorce against her spouse, and named her mother-in-law, appellant Jean Brown, as a co-defendant. The gravamen of the claim against appellant was that certain real property titled in her name actually belonged to appellee and her husband, and was, therefore, subject to equitable division in the divorce proceeding. See generally DeGarmo v. DeGarmo, 269 Ga. 480, 481(2), 499 S.E.2d 317 (1998). The complaint was served on appellant on March 11, 1998, but she did not file an answer until October 26, 1998. Before the case was called for trial in April of 1999, appellee moved for default judgment against appellant. The trial court granted the motion, and entered a default judgment establishing that appellant held the property in trust for the benefit of appellee and her husband. The jury's subsequent verdict mandated a sale of the property, with a designated amount of the proceeds used to pay marital debts and any balance awarded to appellant. We granted appellant's application for discretionary appeal, in order to determine whether the trial court erred in entering default judgment against her. Although OCGA § 9-11-55 is authority for the grant of default judgments, OCGA § 19-5-8 provides that "[n]o verdict or judgment by default shall be taken" in actions for divorce, alimony or child custody. Accordingly, resolution of this appeal depends upon whether appellee's claim against appellant constitutes an action which OCGA § 19-5-8 specifically exempts from the general ambit of OCGA § 9-11-55. The allegations against appellant raise a material issue with regard to the equitable division of marital property. Stokes v. Stokes, 246 Ga. 765, 273 S.E.2d 169 (1980). This is an equitable claim which arises only as the result of the underlying divorce action. Bedford v. Bedford, 246 Ga. 780, 781, 273 S.E.2d 167 (1980). Because equity seeks always to do complete justice, third parties are properly joined in a divorce action so as to facilitate resolution of the spouses' marital claims. OCGA § 23-1-7; Roberts v. Roberts, 226 Ga. 203, 209(9), 173 S.E.2d 675 (1970) (alimony). Such a claim against a non-spouse has always been considered an integral part of the divorce action to which it was joined for that limited purpose. See Shah v. Shah, 270 Ga. 649, 651(2), 513...

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Carden v. Carden, A03A1903.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • March 8, 2004
    ...given a pleading, but it is the substance of the pleadings that determines its nature."). 17. OCGA § 23-1-7; Brown v. Brown, 271 Ga. 887, 525 S.E.2d 359 (2000). 18. Davis, supra at 34, 195 S.E.2d 19. McNeal, supra at 838, 213 S.E.2d 845. ...
  • Barrup v. Barrup
    • United States
    • Vermont Supreme Court
    • November 7, 2014
    ...spouses' marital claims.’ ” 1 B. Turner, Equitable Distribution of Property § 3:6, at 112–13 (3d ed.2005) (quoting Brown v. Brown, 271 Ga. 887, 525 S.E.2d 359, 360 (2000) ). In a divorce proceeding where the family division's ruling on ownership of a particular asset will directly affect a ......
  • Nix v. Scarbrough
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • November 3, 2023
    ... ... the spouses' marital claims," Brown v ... Brown, 271 Ga. 887, 888 (525 S.E.2d 359) (2000), there ... was no issue raised ... ...
  • Searcy v. Searcy, S05A1816.
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • March 13, 2006
    ...was in either estate or that Husband had co-mingled marital assets with property of the estates. Wife's reliance on Brown v. Brown, 271 Ga. 887, 888, 525 S.E.2d 359 (2000), where this Court held "third parties are properly joined in a divorce action so as to facilitate resolution of the spo......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Domestic Relations - Barry B. Mcgough and Gregory R. Miller
    • United States
    • Mercer University School of Law Mercer Law Reviews No. 58-1, September 2006
    • Invalid date
    ...cf. Gardner v. Gardner, 276 Ga. 189, 191, 576 S.E.2d 857, 859 (2003). 43. Searcy, 280 Ga. at 313; 627 S.E.2d at 574; cf.Brown v. Brown, 271 Ga. 887, 888, 525 S.E.2d 359, 360 (2000); Roberts v. Roberts, 226 Ga. 203, 209, 173 S.E.2d 675, 679-80 (1970). 44. 280 Ga. 454, 629 S.E.2d 222 (2006). ......
  • Domestic Relations - Barry B. Mcgough and Gregory R. Miller
    • United States
    • Mercer University School of Law Mercer Law Reviews No. 52-1, September 2000
    • Invalid date
    ...Id. at 382, 535 S.E.2d at 342 (citing In re Hall County Grand Jury Proceedings, 175 Ga. App. 349, 352, 333 S.E.2d 389, 392 (1985)). 12. 271 Ga. 887, 525 S.E.2d 359 (2000). 13. Id. at 887, 525 S.E.2d at 359. 14. Id. at 888, 525 S.E.2d at 360. 15. O.C.G.A. Sec. 19-9-H3XB) (Supp. 2000). 16. Id......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT