Brown v. El Dorado Union High Sch. Dist.
Decision Date | 29 March 2022 |
Docket Number | C088204 |
Citation | 76 Cal.App.5th 1003,292 Cal.Rptr.3d 72 |
Parties | Nicholas BROWN, a Minor, etc., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. EL DORADO UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant and Respondent. |
Court | California Court of Appeals |
Dreyer Babich Buccola Wood Campora, Roger A. Dreyer, Robert B. Bale, Sacramento; and C. Athena Roussos, Sacramento, for Appellant Nicholas Brown by and through his Guardian ad Litem Laurie Brown for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Horvitz & Levy, Steven S. Fleischman, Burbank, Scott P. Dixler ; Schuering Zimmerman & Doyle, Robert H. Zimmerman, Keith D. Chidlaw, Sacramento; Matheny, Sears, Linkert & Jaime, and Matthew C. Jaime, Sacramento, for Defendant and Respondent.
Plaintiff Nicholas Brown (Nick), through his mother and Guardian ad Litem Laurie Brown (Laurie), brought a personal injury action against defendant El Dorado Union High School District (the District) after Nick suffered a traumatic brain injury during a football game.
After the District brought a summary judgment motion, the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the District on two grounds. First, the trial court found the case was barred by the affirmative defense of an express assumption of risk due to a release and waiver Nick and his father, Read Brown (Read), signed prior to the football season. Second, the court found the action was barred by the principle of the primary assumption of risk.
Nick now appeals, challenging the trial court's decision to accept a less-than-perfect separate statement of undisputed material facts (separate statement) filed by the District, evidentiary rulings, and the substance of the trial court's ruling on the motion for summary judgment. We find the trial court acted within its discretion in accepting the separate statement, Nick has failed to sufficiently develop his arguments regarding the court's evidentiary rulings, and summary judgment was proper due to the Browns’ express assumption of the risks associated with Nick's participation in the football program. Accordingly, we affirm.
In August 2015, Nick was a sophomore at Union Mine High School and played on the junior varsity football team. Union Mine is a high school within the District.
According to Jay Aliff, the Athletic Director for Union Mine High School, prior to the 2015-2016 academic year, every student who wished to participate in extracurricular athletics was to receive an athletic handbook from their coach or Aliff's office. According to a cover letter included in the handbook, "[t]he following information in this Extracurricular Athletic Handbook must be read, reviewed, and agreed upon by your student athlete."
Included with that handbook was an "El Dorado Union High School District Release of Liability and Assumption of Risk Agreement [for] Athletics & Cheer/Stunt." Prior to the start of the 2015-2016 football season, Nick and his father signed this form. The release states, "my son ... may participate in the school-related activities designated above." Someone checked the boxes for baseball and football on the release Read and Nick signed.
The release provides that if Nick "is hurt, injured, or even dies, I/we (i.e., the student, his/her parent/s, guardian/s, heir/s ...) will not make a claim against or sue the El Dorado Union High School District (hereinafter EDUHSD), its trustees, officers, employees, and agents, or expect them to be responsible or pay for any damages."
The release included the following:
Read's signature on the release was sufficient to bind Nick to its terms. ( Eriksson v. Nunnink (2015) 233 Cal.App.4th 708, 721, 183 Cal.Rptr.3d 234 [].)
Also included with the handbook was a Parent Concussion/Head Injury Information Sheet that described the protocol for removing a student athlete from and then returning the student to practice and/or competition when the student athlete was suspected of sustaining a head injury. The form indicates concussion injuries "can lead to ... severe brain swelling ... with devastating and even fatal consequences." Read and Nick signed this form, and dated it the same date as the release.
According to Aliff, the packet with the forms and handbook also included a sheet entitled "Parent Concussion/Head Injury Symptoms & Signs." The form stated concussions could be caused "by a bump, blow, or jolt to the head, or by a blow to another part of the body with the force transmitted to the head."
In his deposition, Nick recalled receiving the handbook at least twice, including once the summer before his sophomore year. Laurie testified she saw a handbook at the beginning of each school year when Nick and his elder brother played sports. She acknowledged her sons would give her the handbook along with forms that needed to be signed, including the one about concussions.
"The California Interscholastic Federation is a voluntary organization that consists of school and school-related personnel with responsibility for administering interscholastic athletic activities in secondary schools." ( Ed. Code, § 33353, subd. (a).)
In their filings below, the parties agreed that the California Interscholastic Federation published a 2015-2016 Constitution and Bylaws (CIF Bylaws) that applied to Union Mine High School, and a 2011 Sports Medicine Handbook (CIF Medicine Handbook). They also agreed that the Sac-Joaquin section of the California Interscholastic Federation published its own 2015-2016 Constitution and Bylaws (SJ CIF Bylaws), which also applied to Union Mine High School.
The Game Management Guidelines contained in the CIF Bylaws "recommended" that school administrative staff "[p]rovide first-aid capability and/or medical doctor availability as needed" at school athletic competitions. The SJ CIF Bylaws provided that, for football games, "[t]he home team shall endeavor to have a doctor at the game." The CIF Medicine Handbook also recommended as part of its section on emergency-preparedness on its bulletin on "Reducing Head and Neck Injuries in Football" that, "[i]f possible, a physician and/or EMT should be present for all games/practices."
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
B.D. v. Blizzard Entm't, Inc.
... ... Brown and Andrew J. Brown for Plaintiffs and ... ...
-
Holt v. Brock
...by granting summary judgment despite violations of California Rules of Court, rule 3.1350. (See Brown v. El Dorado Union High School Dist. (2022) 76 Cal.App.5th 1003, 1020, 292 Cal.Rptr.3d 72 [no abuse of discretion where plaintiff did not explain how the alleged deficiency in the defendant......
-
Ramirez v. City of San Jose
... ... losing parties. [Citation.]" (Brown v. El Dorado ... Union High School Dist ... ...
-
Valter v. Mammoth Mountain Ski Area, LLC
... ... (See ... Brown v. El Dorado Union High School Dist. (2022) 76 ... ...