Brown v. Elliott, 42456

Decision Date24 January 1967
Docket NumberNo. 42456,No. 3,42456,3
Citation115 Ga.App. 89,153 S.E.2d 665
PartiesEdna BROWN v. O. E. ELLIOTT
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

W. M. Mathews, Jr., Atlanta, for appellant.

J. E. Wilson, Hapeville, for appellee.

Syllabus Opinion by the Court

QUILLIAN, Judge.

The appeal in the instant case was taken from the sustaining of a general demurrer to the plaintiff's petition. The defendants have moved to dismiss this appeal on the ground that it is premature because the defendant's cross action is still pending in the court below. Held:

Where as in the case sub judice the answer of the defendant contained a prayer for affirmative legal relief germane to the plaintiff's suit, the dismissal of the plaintiff's suit on general demurrer would not carry with it the defendant's cross action. Wallace v. Eiselman, 219 Ga. 307, 133 S.E.2d 355. Hence, the cross action is still pending and there being no final judgment within the contemplation of the Appellate Practice Act of 1965, Ga.L.1965, p. 18 (Code Ann. § 6-701), the appeal is prematurely brought (Chemetron Corp. v. Southern Nitrogen Co., 102 Ga.App. 577, 117 S.E.2d 180; Chambless v. Cain, 107 Ga.App. 738, 131 S.E.2d 117) and must be

Dismissed.

FRANKUM, P.J., and DEEN, J., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Passmore v. Truman & Smith Institute, Inc.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 5 Diciembre 1967
    ...carry with it the defendant's cross action. Chemetron Corp. v. Southern Nitrogen Co., 102 Ga.App. 577, 17 S.E.2d 180; Brown v. Elliott, 115 Ga.App. 89, 90, 153 S.E.2d 665. With the cross action still pending the appeal is premature since there is not a final judgment under Code Ann. § 6-701......
  • Blanchard v. West
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 22 Mayo 1967
    ...the case remained pending in the lower court, and an appeal by the plaintiff at that time would have been premature. Brown v. Elliott, 115 Ga.App. 89, 153 S.E.2d 665. 2. The petition in the present case shows, in essence, that the plaintiff and defendant were equal owners of Ace Bonding Com......
  • Builders Supply Co. v. Pilgrim, 42308
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 24 Enero 1967
  • Conte Enterprises, Inc. v. Romax Const. Co., Inc.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 7 Febrero 1973
    ...is premature and this court is without jurisdiction to consider it. O'Kelley v. Evans, 223 Ga. 512, 156 S.E.2d 450; Brown v. Elliott, 115 Ga.App. 89, 153 S.E.2d 665; Passmore v. Truman & Smith Institute, 116 Ga.App. 803, 159 S.E.2d 92; Butler Auction Co., Inc. v. Hosch, 119 Ga.App. 562, 167......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT