Brown v. Felkel, 24590
| Decision Date | 21 January 1997 |
| Docket Number | No. 24590,24590 |
| Citation | 326 S.C. 36,482 S.E.2d 564 |
| Court | South Carolina Supreme Court |
| Parties | James L. BROWN, Jr., a/k/a James L. Brown, Petitioner, v. Dal H. FELKEL and Dal H. Felkel & Associates, Respondents. . Heard |
E.N. Zeigler, Florence, for petitioner.
Kenneth R. Young, Jr., of Young, Young & Reiter, P.A., of Sumter and Daryl J. Corbin, Florence, for respondents.
We granted certiorari to review the Court of Appeals' decision in Brown v. Felkel, 320 S.C. 292, 465 S.E.2d 93 (Ct.App.1995). We dismiss certiorari as improvidently granted.
/s/ Earnest A. Finney, Jr., C.J.
/s/ Jean H. Toal, A.J.
/s/ James E. Moore, A.J.
/s/ John H. Waller, Jr., A.J.
/s/ E.C. Burnett, III, A.J.
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 cases
-
Cowart v. Poore
...the stage of final adjudication. Id. Brown v. Felkel, 320 S.C. 292, 294, 465 S.E.2d 93, 95 (Ct.App. 1995) cert. dismissed, 326 S.C. 36, 482 S.E.2d 564 (1997). As we have stated, there can be no double recovery for a single wrong. This is the basic purpose of the election of remedies doctrin......
- Gaster v. Evatt