Brown v. Massey
Decision Date | 02 February 1897 |
Citation | 38 S.W. 939,138 Mo. 519 |
Parties | BROWN et al. v. MASSEY. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
1. An agreement for the purchase of lands by B. recited that, "in consideration that said M. hereby guaranties that said land will yield to said B. not less than the sum of $4,000 on or before 18 months from the date of said purchase, * * * B. agrees that M. shall manage, subdivide, and sell said property for such price or prices as they may agree upon, M. to receive one-half of the profits of said sales over and above the $4,000, * * * which sum is to be first returned to B." Held, that M. bound himself, unconditionally, to realize and pay to B. $4,000 at the end of 18 months, at the latest.
2. The agreement did not give M. any interest in the lands, and hence B.'s remedy for M.'s failure to perform was not in equity for sale of the lands, application of the proceeds on the debt, and a decree for the deficiency.
3. Where land was bought for speculation, and a third person, for one-half the profits which he might make by a subdivision and sale of lots, agreed to realize and repay the price within 18 months, or relieve the investor of his bargain, specific performance of the agreement will not be enforced after three years from expiration of said time, where there was no excuse for the delay, and no demand was made for performance promptly after the 18 months, notwithstanding the land could have been sold at a large profit, and in the meantime the property has decreased in value 50 per cent.
4. A letter of which the addressee disclaims all recollection is not admissible in the absence of explanation as to its origin or custody.
Appeal from circuit court, Greene county; James T. Neville, Judge.
Bill by Susan C. Brown, executrix of Alexander Brown, deceased, and others, against Benjamin U. Massey. From a decree in favor of defendant, complainants appeal. Affirmed.
Goode & Cravens, for appellants. Karnes, Holmes & Krauthoff and W. D. Tatlow, for respondent.
This is a suit in equity based upon the following written agreement:
The foregoing stipulations are both written on the same sheet of paper.
Alexander Brown died in April, 1893, having given his estate, by his last will, to his wife and children, and appointed his wife executrix. This suit is prosecuted by his wife and children. The petition alleges the death of Mr. Brown; the execution and probate of his will, and the provisions thereof, and the making of the foregoing contract, setting it out at length. The pleaders then make the following allegations: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State ex rel. United Factories v. Hostetter
... ... continues: "This general rule is supported by a wealth ... of authorities, among which are the following: Brown v ... Massey, 138 Mo. 519, 38 S.W. 939; Fowle v. Adams ... Express Co., 9 Mo.App. 572 ... [344 ... Mo. 394] "The reason ... ...
-
State ex rel. United Factories v. Hostetter, 36222.
... ... and genuineness." The opinion then continues: "This general rule is supported by a wealth of authorities, among which are the following: Brown v. Massey, 138 Mo. 519, 38 S.W. 939; Fowle v. Adams Express Co., 9 Mo. App. 572 ... "The reason for the distinction being made, ... ...
-
Bank of New Madrid v. Bullock
... ... repudiate it if it should prove to his advantage. Davis ... et al. v. Petty, 147 Mo. 374, 49 S.W. 944; Blies v ... Prichard, 67 Mo. 186; Brown v. Massey, 138 Mo ... 519, 38 S.W. 939. (5) Time of performance was made an ... essential and material element of the original contract ... ...
-
Barton County Rock Asphalt Co. v. City of Fayette
... ... appellant, the same not having been properly identified, and ... being incompetent and immaterial. Brown v. Massey, ... 138 Mo. 519; Royle Mining Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co ... of N. Y., 161 Mo.App. 185, 197; United Factories v ... Brigham, 117 ... ...