Brown v. Meeks
Decision Date | 29 September 1936 |
Docket Number | No. 10107.,10107. |
Citation | 96 S.W.2d 839 |
Parties | BROWN v. MEEKS. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Bexar County; S. B. Carr, Special Judge.
Election contest proceeding by S. M. (Charles) Meeks against Gus Brown. From an adverse judgment, the defendant appeals.
Judgment of the trial judge reversed in part, and judgment entered in accordance with opinion.
J. I. Kercheville, Wm. Aubrey, Raymond Gerhardt, M. L. Roark, and J. Arthur Sandlin, all of San Antonio, for appellant.
Leonard Brown, Johnson, Rogers & Slatton, and R. L. Neal, all of San Antonio, for appellee.
This is an election contest between S. M. (Charles) Meeks and Gus Brown over the Democratic nomination for the office of constable of precinct No. 1, Bexar county, Tex.
The contest was begun by Meeks, and this suit was filed in the Thirty-Seventh district court of Bexar county, and resulted in a judgment in his favor declaring him to be the Democratic nominee as the result of the primary election held July 25, 1936, for the office of constable of precinct No. 1, Bexar county, Tex., from which judgment Brown has prosecuted this appeal.
The controversy arose in this manner: Heretofore justice of the peace precinct No. 1, of Bexar county, has been composed of that territory which lies within the city limits of the city of San Antonio, including voting precincts 1 to 105, inclusive, and the territory which lies within the city limits of the city of Alamo Heights, including voting precincts 138 to 140, inclusive, and certain rural territory, which includes voting precincts 134 and 141.
On April 1, 1936, the commissioners' court of Bexar county decided to redistrict the county with reference to justice of the peace precincts, and on that date passed an order which by its terms was to become effective on January 1, 1937, redistricting Bexar county, and subdivided the county into five instead of eight justice precincts.
On May 1, 1936, the commissioners' court passed another order, effective January 1, 1937, adding to precinct No. 1 voting precincts 106 to 113, inclusive.
However, on June 1, 1936, the commissioners' court set aside its order as passed on May 1, 1936, and amended its said order of April 1, 1936, by passing the following order, which was also effective January 1, 1937, to wit:
This order placed practically all the territory of what we will hereafter call "Old Precinct No. 1 and Old Precinct No. 6" into what we will hereafter call "new Precinct No. 1." The only territory in old precinct No. 1, which was not included in New precinct No. 1, was that territory in which are situated voting precincts Nos. 134 and 141.
At the Democratic primary, held on July 25, 1936, S. M. Meeks and Gus Brown were opposing candidates, and the only candidates, for the office of constable of precinct No. 1, Bexar county. The election was not held in old precinct No. 1, but was held in new precinct No. 1. Thus the Democratic executive committee attempted to give effect to the last two paragraphs of the order of June 1, 1936, which provided, in effect, that, while the New Precinct No. 1 was not to come into existence until January 1, 1937, persons might become candidates and vote as though the order had gone into immediate effect; that is, on June 1, 1936, prior to the primary election.
According to the election returns, Brown received a majority of 498 votes in the territory which was to constitute new precinct No. 1, if, as, and when the order of June 1, 1936, became effective.
This presents the question of whether or not it was within the power of the commissioners' court to authorize persons to become candidates for office and vote in a precinct to be created in the future, or whether such persons otherwise possessed the legal right to become candidates and to vote in such new precinct No. 1, as was stated in such order.
The Constitution and statutes of this state, particularly article 2927, R.S.1925 prescribe the qualifications of candidates. One of such qualifications is that a candidate for office must reside for six months in the precinct in which he attempts to become a candidate for office. Certainly no one is at the present time a resident of new precinct No. 1, for the very simple reason that this legal entity does not exist at the present time. It will not come into existence, according to its own terms, prior to January 1, 1937. Until that time no legal entity in the form of a new justice precinct is in existence.
There can be no question as to the power of the commissioners' court to create new justice precincts, from time to time, for the convenience of the people. This power is given to the commissioners' courts by the Constitution of Texas (article 5, § 18) and by the statutes of this state. Article 2351, subd. 1, R.C.S.1925; State ex rel. Dowlen v. Rigsby, 17 Tex. Civ.App. 171, 43 S.W. 271; Turner v. Allen (Tex.Civ.App.) 254 S.W. 630.
The commissioners' court also has the power, when lawfully exercised, to pass an order redistricting the county into new justice of the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
43 32 v. Moore 8212 1475
...12 There is support for this view in several early cases and in a number of state Attorney General's opinions. See Brown v. Meeks, 96 S.W.2d 839 (Tex.Ct.Civ.App. 1936); State ex rel. Dowlen v. Rigsby, 17 Tex.Civ.App. 171, 43 S.W. 271, holding approved, 91 Tex. 351, 43 S.W. 1101 (1897); Ops.......
-
Setliff v. Gorrell
...powers of the district. Harrison v. Jay, 280 S.W.2d 636 (Tex.Civ.App.--Eastland 1953, no writ history); Brown v. Meeks, 96 S.W.2d 839 (Tex.Civ.App.--San Antonio 1936, error dism.); Clark v. Stubbs, 131 S.W.2d 663 (Tex.Civ.App.--Austin 1939, no writ In appellants' first point they have chall......
-
McCraw v. Vickers
...the Peace precinct. Telles v. Sample, 500 S.W.2d 677, 679 (Tex.Civ.App.--El Paso 1973, writ ref'd n.r.e.); Brown v. Meeks, 96 S.W.2d 839 (Tex.Civ.App.--San Antonio 1936, writ dism'd). In State ex. rel. Maxwell v. Crumbaugh, 26 Tex.Civ.App. 521, 63 S.W. 925, 927 (1901, writ ref'd), the court......
-
Chenault v. Bexar County
...writ ref'd n.r.e.); Telles v. Sample, 500 S.W.2d 677 (Tex.Civ.App.--El Paso 1973, writ ref'd n.r.e.); Brown v. Meeks, 96 S.W.2d 839 (Tex.Civ.App.--San Antonio 1936, writ dism'd). The Commissioners' Court, passed the Justice Abolition Order more than one year prior to its effective date, the......