Brown v. State
| Decision Date | 09 April 1947 |
| Docket Number | A-10660. |
| Citation | 179 P.2d 478,84 Okla.Crim. 115 |
| Parties | BROWN v. STATE. |
| Court | United States State Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma |
Appeal from County Court, Major County; Harry Randall, Judge.
Bill Brown was convicted of unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor, and he appeals.
Appeal dismissed, and cause remanded with directions to enforce the judgment and sentence.
Syllabus by the Court.
1. When an appeal in a misdemeanor case is not taken within the 60 days prescribed by the statute (22 O.S. 1941 § 1054), the record or case-made must affirmatively show that the trial court or judge thereof for good cause shown extended the time; otherwise this court is without jurisdiction to review the judgment, and such appeal will be dismissed.
2. A failure to file the appeal in the appellate court within the time allowed by law is fatal to the appeal, and the appellate court has no discretion to hear and determine appeal on its merits when it is not taken within the time prescribed by statute.
3. Record examined and appeal in misdemeanor case is dismissed because filed in appellate court more than sixty days after pronouncement of judgment and sentence and record does not disclose that any extension of time in which such an appeal could have been filed was given.
Willis & Manning, of Fairview, for plaintiff in error.
Mac Q Williamson, Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.
This is an attempted appeal from a conviction sustained by the defendant in the County Court of Major County.
The verdict of the jury was returned on March 6, 1945. Motion for new trial was filed on March 9, 1945. Because of the illness of the defendant the pronouncement of judgment and sentence in accordance with the verdict of the jury was postponed until April 19, 1945 at 10:00 A.M. On April 19, 1945, the motion for new trial was overruled and judgment and sentence was entered in accordance with the verdict of the jury. No extension of time was ever asked or given to the defendant to file his appeal in the Criminal Court of Appeals. The appeal was filed in the Criminal Court of Appeals on July 10, 1945, which was more than sixty days after the rendition of the judgment.
On behalf of the State, the Attorney General has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for the reason that it was not taken within the sixty days prescribed by statute, 22 O.S. 1941 § 1054. No response was filed by the defendant to the motion to dismiss.
In...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Loving v. State
... ... is without jurisdiction to review the judgment, and such ... appeal will be dismissed.' See also Gunter v ... State, 13 Okl.Cr. 83, 162 P. 231; Wilkerson v ... State, 76 Okl.Cr. 152, 134 P.2d 998; Miller v ... State, 78 Okl.Cr. 112, 144 P.2d 120. In Brown v ... State, Okl.Cr.App., 179 P.2d 478, 479, not yet reported ... in State Reports, it was further said: 'A failure to file ... the appeal in this Court within the time allowed by the law ... is fatal to the appeal and this Court has no discretion to ... determine the appeal unless it is ... ...
-
Nix v. City of Tulsa
...State, 78 Okl.Cr. 112, 144 P.2d 120; Wilkerson v. State, 76 Okl.Cr. 152, 134 P.2d 998; Gunter v. State, 13 Okl.Cr. 83, 162 P. 231. In Brown v. State, supra, this court said: 'A failure to file the appeal in this Court within the time allowed by the law is fatal to the appeal and this Court ......
-
Haygood v. State
...13 Okl.Cr. 83, 162 P. 231; Wilkerson v. State, 76 Okl.Cr. 152, 134 P.2d 998; Miller v. State, 78 Okl.Cr. 112, 144 P.2d 120; Brown v. State, Okl.Cr., 179 P.2d 478. the reasons hereinabove stated, the purported appeal herein should be dismissed and the cause remanded to the trial court with d......
- Ryals v. State