Brown v. State
Decision Date | 13 April 1936 |
Docket Number | 31375. |
Citation | 167 So. 82 |
Court | Mississippi Supreme Court |
Parties | Ed BROWN et al. v. STATE of Mississippi. |
In Banc.
Appeal from Circuit Court, Kemper County; J. I. Sturdivant, Judge.
" Not to be reported in State Reports."
Conforming to mandate of the Supreme Court of the United States in 56 S.Ct. 461, 80 L.Ed.__.
John A. Clark and D. P. Davis, both of De Kalb, and Brewer & Hewitt, of Jackson, for appellants.
Greek L. Rice, Atty. Gen., and W. D. Conn, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
The judgment of the court below was affirmed by this court at a former term thereof, Brown v. State, 173 Miss. 542, 158 So. 339, 161 So. 465; but the judgment of affirmance was reversed by the Supreme Court of the United States, Brown et al. v. State of Mississippi, 56 S.Ct. 461, 80 L.Ed.__, the ground of the reversal being that the confessions of the appellant should have been excluded from the evidence.
In obedience to the mandate and opinion of that court, the judgment of the court below will be reversed, and the cause will be remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with that opinion.
Reversed and remanded.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hunter v. State
...v. State, 102 So. 771; Brettinum v. State, 167 So. 619; Simon v. State, 37 Miss. 288; Ellis v. State, 65 Miss. 44, 3 So. 188; Brown v. State, 167 So. 82; Fletcher v. State, So. 251. Appellant's motion for a directed verdict upon the charge of murder should have been sustained for the reason......