Brown v. State
Decision Date | 23 May 1906 |
Citation | 95 S.W. 1039 |
Parties | BROWN v. STATE. |
Court | Texas Court of Criminal Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Medina County; R. H. Burney, Judge.
Henry Brown was convicted of murder, and appeals. Affirmed.
C. C. Harris, Dist. Atty., and J. E. Yantis, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
Appellant was awarded the death penalty for murder. He raises but two questions: (1) That the evidence is not sufficient to show a killing upon express malice; and (2) that, as he was serving out two sentences for murder, one for life and the other for 99 years, he could not be legally tried for the murder charged in the indictment.
We hardly think that the second question can be seriously argued. We have not been cited to any authorities, nor are we aware of any provision of law, statutory or otherwise, that would prevent the trial and conviction of a convict for homicide, or for any other offense, committed while he was detained as a prisoner by virtue of his prior conviction. It would take very strong reason or authority, or an express statute, to show that the person confined in the penitentiary could not be tried and punished for the homicide of one of his fellow convicts.
Nor do we believe the other contention, to wit, the insufficiency of the testimony, is well taken. The evidence for the state shows that deceased (Taylor) and appellant were convicts and employed on a railroad in Medina county. On the morning of July 25th, deceased and appellant were working close to each other, and deceased threw a shovelful of gravel on the part of the roadbed where appellant was working. Appellant told him not to repeat the throwing of the gravel. Taylor threw another shovelful to the same place, and appellant struck him with his shovel. This shovel is described as having a steel blade, some 10 inches wide, slightly cupped and rounded at the point, and somewhat longer than wide, with a handle about three feet long; the whole weighing from four to eight pounds. The witnesses differ as to the weight. One puts it at four to five pounds, and the other six to eight. A scuffle ensued between the parties, which seems to have been not of a serious nature, and they were separated. Appellant cursed Taylor, and remarked to him in a loud voice: Some half hour afterwards, while deceased was on his all-fours, adjusting some work about the cross-ties, appellant approached him from behind and struck him on the neck with the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Frankel v. Woodrough
...L. R. A. 1915E, 363; Coleman v. State, 35 Tex. Cr. R. 404, 33 S. W. 1083; Gaines v. State (Tex. Cr. R.) 53 S. W. 623; Brown v. State, 50 Tex. Cr. R. 114, 95 S. W. 1039; People v. Flynn, 7 Utah, 378, 26 P. 1114; Ruffin v. Commonwealth, 21 Grat. (62 Va.) 790; Clifford v. Dryden, 31 Wash. 545,......
-
State v. Keefe
... ... 295; Peri v. People, 65 Ill. 17; ... People v. Majors, 65 Cal. 138, 3 P. 597; Coleman ... v. State, 35 Tex. Crim. 404, 33 S.W. 1083; Rigor v ... State, 101 Md. 465, 61 A. 631; State v. Wilson, ... 38 Conn. 126; People v. Flynn, (Utah) 7 Utah 378, 26 ... P. 1114; Brown v. State, (Tex.) 50 Tex. Crim. 114, ... 95 S.W. 1039; Huffaker v. Comm. (Ky.) 124 Ky. 115, ... 98 S.W. 331; Clifford v. Dryden, 31 Wash. 545, 72 P ... 96; Henderson v. James, 52 Ohio St. 242, 39 N.E ... 805; Kennedy v. Howard, 74 Ind. 87; State v ... Connell, 49 Mo. 282; Ex parte ... ...
-
Blitch v. Buchanan
... 131 So. 151 100 Fla. 1202 BLITCH, Superintendent of State Prison v. BUCHANAN. [ * ] Florida Supreme Court November 12, 1930 ... En ... Error ... to Circuit Court, Union County; ... error was allowed and taken under section 5444(3580), ... Compiled General Laws of Florida 1927 ... BROWN, ... J., dissenting ... COUNSEL ... [131 So. 153] ... [100 ... Fla. 1205] Fred H. Davis, Atty. Gen., and Roy Campbell, ... ...
-
Harris v. State
...legislation. Williams v. State, 130 Ala. 31, 30 So. 336; Singleton v. State, 71 Miss. 782, 16 So. 295, 42 Am.St.Rep. 488; Brown v. State, 50 Tex.Cr.R. 114, 95 S.W. 1039; People v. Hong Ah Duck, 61 Cal. 387; People v. Majors, 65 Cal. 138, 3 P. 597, 52 Am.Rep. 295; State v. Connell, 49 Mo. 28......