Brown v. State, 90-2700.
| Decision Date | 31 March 1992 |
| Docket Number | No. 90-2700.,90-2700. |
| Citation | 596 So.2d 507 |
| Parties | Stanley Leon BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Nancy L. Showalter, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and James W. Rogers, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Stanley Leon Brown has appealed a sentence imposed after pleading guilty to grand theft, and admitting a community control violation (he had received community control as a condition of probation after pleading guilty to the offense of lewd act on a child in an unrelated case). His counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) averring that he could make no good faith argument for reversible error, save that the written probation order reflected a special condition not orally pronounced at sentencing. The state has moved to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction based on Brown's guilty plea.
The motion to dismiss the appeal is denied. See Pyle v. State, Case No. 90-3800, ___ So.2d ___ (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). We reverse, and remand for correction of the written order of probation to conform to the oral pronouncement of the probation conditions at the sentencing hearing.1
1 At the sentencing proceeding, the trial court orally reimposed the conditions of probation previously imposed after Brown's guilty plea to the offense of lewd act on a child. The previous conditions did not require Brown to "undergo alcohol/substance abuse screening and, if deemed necessary by your Officer, immediately become enrolled in and satisfactorily complete alcohol/substance abuse counselling or treatment as directed by the Officer," but this condition was reflected in the written probation order entered herein.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Johnson v. State, 92-3117
...circumstances, the trial court's verbal pronouncement controls over any subsequent conflicting written order. Brown v. State, 596 So.2d 507, 508 & n. 1 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). On this first issue, the state concedes that Appellant is entitled to additional jail credit time. Therefore, we reman......