Brown v. State, 48540
| Citation | 130 Ga.App. 11,202 S.E.2d 268 |
| Decision Date | 16 October 1973 |
| Docket Number | No. 48540,No. 1,48540,1 |
| Parties | Lawrence B. BROWN v. The STATE |
| Court | United States Court of Appeals (Georgia) |
Syllabus by the Court
1. The court did not err in denying the motion to suppress.
2. It was not error to deny the motion for directed verdict of acquittal.
The defendant was convicted of possession of illegal drugs. The denial of his motion to suppress is enumerated as error. The issue is the sufficiency of an affidavit to show probable cause for a search warrant. The affidavit was made by a deputy sheriff who averred that an informer, who had furnished information in the past which led to the arrest of other named individuals for drug violations, advised him that at a described house occupied by the defendant and two other individuals drugs were used and sold; that defendant was the main pusher; that the informer had seen the defendant sell marijuana a week previously from an auto and that the drugs were usually hidden a short distance from the house in some bushes. The deputy further averred that he and another police officer for the preceding three weeks had observed the house from time to time and saw known drug users going in and out of the house, and that he had previously arrested the defendant for possession of marijuana and dangerous drugs.
Ellis & Ellis, George R. Ellis, Jr., Americus, for appellant.
Claude N. Morris, Dist. Atty., Americus, for appellee.
1. Where the informer's hearsay is relied on to furnish probable cause, two tests must be met: (1) The reasons for the informer's reliability must be shown and (2) the affidavit must state how the informer obtained the information or must describe the criminal activity in such detail that the magistrate may know it is more than a casual rumor circulating in the underworld or an accusation based merely on the individual's general reputation. Sams v. State, 121 Ga.App. 46, 172 S.E.2d 473. The affidavit here was sufficient to show that the informer was reliable. The question is whether the second test has been met. The informer did not reveal the source of his information that drugs were used and sold on the premises, i.e., whether he learned this by personal observation or from other sources and whether the other sources were reliable. On the other hand, while the informer does not state the way in which he obtained his information, he stated that he had observed the defendant selling marijuana approximately a week earlier and he was very specific in giving detailed information as to the usual place where the drugs were lodged on the premises. When the issuing magistrate was confronted with the detail as to the past reliability of the informant, the informer's personal knowledge of the recent prior sale and the usual place where the drugs were hidden, together with the police officers' knowledge of the defendant's prior drug violation, the magistrate could...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Fears v. State, 66559
...it is for the jury to determine guilt or innocence. See Kent v. State, 105 Ga.App. 312, 314(1), 124 S.E.2d 296; Brown v. State, 130 Ga.App. 11, 13, 202 S.E.2d 268; Walker v. State, 140 Ga.App. 418, 419, 231 S.E.2d 386, supra; Moore v. State, 155 Ga.App. 149, 150-151, 270 S.E.2d 339, supra; ......
-
Smith v. State
...208 S.E.2d 150; Davis v. State, 129 Ga.App. 158, 198 S.E.2d 913; Compare: Sams v. State, 121 Ga.App. 46, 172 S.E.2d 473; Brown v. State, 130 Ga.App. 11, 202 S.E.2d 268. Chief Justice Burger, in Harris, stated that, '(i)n determining what quantum of information is necessary to support a beli......
-
Moore v. State, 59809
...his "stuff." This evidence was an acknowledgment by the defendant that the police officer had found "stuff." As in Brown v. State, 130 Ga.App. 11, 13(2), 202 S.E.2d 268, this evidence would clearly authorize the jury to infer that the defendant was in the possession and control of the Havin......
-
Brown v. Ricketts
...the trial court's overruling of a motion to suppress evidence allegedly seized illegally. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Brown v. State, 130 Ga.App. 11, 202 S.E.2d 268. Appellant thereafter filed his petition for writ of habeas corpus in the Superior Court of Butts County which as amended a......