Brown v. State
Decision Date | 20 January 1926 |
Docket Number | (No. 9013.) |
Citation | 279 S.W. 837 |
Parties | BROWN v. STATE. |
Court | Texas Court of Criminal Appeals |
Appeal from Martin County Court; A. C. Eidson, Special Judge.
Doc Brown was convicted of negligent homicide, and he appeals. Reversed and remanded.
B. Frank Haag, of Midland, for appellant.
Sam D. Stinson, State's Atty., of Austin, and Nat Gentry, Jr., Asst. State's Atty., of Tyler, for the State.
The offense is negligent homicide; punishment fixed at confinement in the county jail for a period of three months. The transaction upon which the prosecution is based was a collision in which the automobile driven by the appellant collided with a truck which was standing upon the highway. Two girls were in the car driven by the appellant. One of these was his sister, Alice Brown; the other was Miss Dollie Wilson, the deceased.
Paragraphs 2 and 4 of the court's charge present the state's case. They are respectively as follows:
According to the evidence, the driver of a Ford truck, in which he was hauling a pair of mules, was stopped on the road, and, while standing there, the appellant drove his car into the rear end of the truck. Prenlena Pena, the driver of the truck, testified that the appellant's car was traveling "much fast." A state's witness who drove into the highway upon which the collision occurred from a byroad and who was traveling upon the highway at the rate of about 15 or 18 miles an hour, testified that the appellant's car was going faster than that in which the witness was riding. The highway was 18 feet wide. With the truck standing on the road, there was about 8 feet of road in which to pass. The truck was standing about 80 feet from a curve, and was not visible from the direction in which the appellant approached until after his car had passed the point of the curve a sufficient distance for the lights to reveal the presence of the truck. There was testimony that it would have been impossible for one driving a Studebaker car of the weight of...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Gann v. Murray
...Tex.Cr.App., 90 S.W. 636; Outley v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 99 S.W. 95; Worley v. State, 89 Tex.Cr.R. 393, 231 S.W. 391; Brown v. State, 103 Tex.Cr.R. 35, 279 S.W. 837; Lahue v. State, 51 Tex.Cr.R. 159, 101 S.W. 1008; Noble v. State, 54 Tex.Cr.R. 436, 113 S.W. 281, 22 L.R.A., N.S., 841; Holland......