Brown v. State, 84-1084

Decision Date13 February 1985
Docket NumberNo. 84-1084,84-1084
Citation467 So.2d 323,10 Fla. L. Weekly 389
Parties10 Fla. L. Weekly 389 Lucretia BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Sara Blumberg and Michael Dubiner of Dubiner & Blumberg, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Joan Fowler Rossin, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of her conviction of second degree murder. She claims that the trial court erred in refusing to instruct the jury on justifiable and excusable homicide, and in failing to give an instruction which properly placed the burden of proof upon the State as to her insanity defense. When the court gives an instruction on manslaughter, it must also give an instruction on justifiable and excusable homicide. See Hedges v. State, 172 So.2d 824 (Fla.1965); Pouk v. State, 359 So.2d 929 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978); Delaford v. State, 449 So.2d 983 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). Therefore, we hold that the trial court erred when it failed to properly instruct the jury, and we reverse and remand this case for a new trial. Because of this holding we need not reach appellant's second point on appeal.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

HERSEY, HURLEY and DELL, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Harris v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 9 Mayo 1991
    ...Hedges v. State, supra (denial of request for charge on justifiable and excusable homicide on reinstructing the jury); Brown v. State, 467 So.2d 323 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 467 So.2d 1000 (Fla.1985) (court refused to instruct the jury on justifiable and excusable homicide in connection......
  • Stockton v. State
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • 25 Mayo 1989
    ...(Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Alejo v. State, 483 So.2d 117 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Smiddy v. State, 468 So.2d 466 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Brown v. State, 467 So.2d 323 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied, 467 So.2d 1000 (Fla.1985); Delaford v. State, 449 So.2d 983 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Kelsey v. State, 410 So.2d ......
  • Rojas v. State
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • 22 Noviembre 1989
    ...cases have applied the same principle to instructions first given to the jury before it retires for deliberation. Brown v. State, 467 So.2d 323 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Delaford v. State, 449 So.2d 983 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). The error has been deemed fundamental when it occurs during the original ......
  • Ortagus v. State, BL-204
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 6 Enero 1987
    ...homicide. See, Alejo v. State, 483 So.2d 117 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Smiddy v. State, 468 So.2d 466 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Brown v. State, 467 So.2d 323 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Delaford v. State, 449 So.2d 983 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Pridgeon v. State, 425 So.2d 8 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Kelsey v. State, 4......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT