Browne v. State

Decision Date16 December 1924
Citation102 So. 546,88 Fla. 457
PartiesBROWNE v. STATE.
CourtFlorida Supreme Court

Error to Circuit Court, Volusia County; J. J. Dickinson, Judge.

Charles Browne, alias Charles Pisellia, alias Charles Piselli, alias Charles Pisella, alias Joseph John Young, was convicted of murder, and he brings error.

Reversed.

Syllabus by the Court

SYLLABUS

Granting or denying postponement or continuance will not be disturbed in absence of abuse of discretion. Application for postponement or continuance is addressed to the sound judicial discretion of the trial court, and the ruling of the court either granting or denying such application will not be disturbed unless an abuse of this discretion is clearly shown.

Accused and counsel are entitled to reasonable time after indictment to prepare for trial; denying postponement or continuance is subject to review on writ of error. An accused and his counsel are entitled to a reasonable time in which to prepare for trial after indictment, and the ruling of a trial court denying an application for postponement or continuance is subject to review on writ of error.

Judgment of conviction will be reversed for abuse of discretion in denying motion for postponement or continuance. Where, in a criminal prosecution, an abuse of discretion in denying a motion for postponement or continuance is clearly shown, and it appears that in the furtherance of justice a new trial should be awarded, a judgment of conviction will be reversed because of such error.

COUNSEL

J. E. Peacock, of De Land, for plaintiff in error.

Rivers Buford, Atty. Gen., and J. B. Gaines, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

OPINION

WEST J.

Plaintiff in error, Charles Browne, alias Charles Pisellia, alias Charles Piselli, alias Charles Pisella, alias Joseph John Young, was jointly indicted with Clara Browne, alias Clara Pisellia, alias Clara Piselli, alias Clare Pisella, his wife and Joe Brown, alias George Browne, alias George F. Burns alias George L. Guinasso. The charge was murder. Upon motion of the state's attorney, there was a severance. Plaintiff in error was put upon trial. There was a verdict of guilty and sentence of death.

The indictment was returned on November 15, 1923. On the same day an attorney was appointed to represent the defendant Charles Browne. The defendant was duly arraigned and entered a plea of not guilty. The case was set to be tried on the 19th day of November, 1923. When the case was reached for trial on that day, there was a motion for a postponement of the trial 'to a date not earlier than Friday November 23, 1923.' The grounds of the motion are that the attorney for defendant had not had reasonable time within which to familiarize himself with the case and prepare for the trial and defense of defendant; that the defendant is a resident of the state of New York; that he 'is afflicted with periodical insanity, and insane delusions, which come over and possess him frequently, frequently weekly, and sometimes more often; that during these spells the defendant is absolutely incompetent, insane, and knows nothing of his actions or conduct; that he has been an inmate of a hospital for the insane, to wit, of Dannemara State Hospital, of Dannemara, New York, in which he has recently been confined for a period of a year and a half; that defendant was in the United States service during the recent World War, during which time he suffered severe physical injury by means of being gassed, and by reason of which injuries he suffers insane delusions and periodical insanity above mentioned'; that he had not had an opportunity to get in communication with his relatives and...

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • Wadsworth v. State
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • January 20, 1939
    ...in a court of justice, no person is wise enough to foretell the possible harm that may result to humanity.' In the case of Browne v. State, 88 Fla. 457, 102 So. 546, the defendant was indicted for murder in the first degree November 15, 1923, when an attorney was appointed to defend him. Th......
  • Diehl v. State
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • January 2, 1935
    ... ... [158 So. 507] ... Ward v. State, 83 Fla. 311, 91 So. 189 ... Such ... discretion will not be interfered with in the absence of ... palpable abuse. Ward v. State, supra; Yarborough v ... State, 94 Fla. 143, 114 So. 237; Hall v. State, supra; ... Maddox v. State, supra; Browne v. State, 88 Fla ... 457, 102 So. 546 ... The ... application fails to show where and how information was ... obtained that an unknown person left the automobile when it ... collided with the concrete column and telegraph pole, nor ... were any persons named who would so testify, ... ...
  • Ammons v. State
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • December 16, 1924
    ... ... bar the court and the people depend for the efficient ... functioning of the judicial system ... We have ... discovered no error in the record, so the judgment is ... affirmed ... TAYLOR, ... C.J., concurs ... BROWNE, ... J., concurs in the affirmance ... WHITFIELD, ... P.J., and WEST and TERRELL, JJ., concur in the ... ...
  • Ex Parte Browne
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • February 19, 1927
    ... ... Charles Pisella, alias Joseph John Young, was on November 23, ... 1923, indicted for a murder alleged to have been committed ... October 21, 1923. A judgment of conviction of murder in the ... first degree was reversed. Browne v. State, 88 Fla ... 457, 102 So. [93 Fla. 333] 546. A second conviction of murder ... in the first degree was affirmed. Browne v. State, ... 92 Fla. 699, 109 So. 811. The sentence imposed by the ... judgment of conviction is death by electrocution, and the ... petitioner is held in custody at the ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT