Brunetti v. Connecticut, 06-940.
Decision Date | 20 February 2007 |
Docket Number | No. 06-940.,06-940. |
Citation | 75 USLW 3421,127 S.Ct. 1328,549 U.S. 1212,75 USLW 3369,167 L.Ed.2d 85,75 USLW 3435 |
Parties | Anthony N. BRUNETTI, petitioner, v. CONNECTICUT. |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Connecticut denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial133 cases
-
State v. Elson, No. 31511.
...Conn.App. 807, 815, 875 A.2d 71 (2005); see also State v. Brunetti, 279 Conn. 39, 63, 901 A.2d 1 (2006), cert. denied, 549 U.S. 1212, 127 S.Ct. 1328, 167 L.Ed.2d 85 (2007). Furthermore, "it isthe [defendant's] burden to provide an adequate record for review.... It is, therefore, the respons......
-
Gleason v. Smolinski
...282 Conn. 141, 157-58, 920 A.2d 236 (2007); State v. Brunetti, 279 Conn. 39, 55-56, 901 A.2d 1 (2006), cert. denied, 549 U.S. 1212, 127 S. Ct. 1328, 167 L. Ed. 2d 85 (2007). Rather—and the dissent's characterization of our analysis notwithstanding—we consider only whether the trial court's ......
-
State v. Dissent
...garnered but on its reasoning''), superseded by State v. Brunetti, 279 Conn. 39, 901 A.2d 1 (2006), cert. denied, 549 U.S. 1212, 127 S. Ct. 1328, 167 L. Ed. 2d 85 (2007). Thus, when this court undertakes an independent analysis of the meaning of article first, § 7, of the state constitution......
-
State v. Fay
...[the defendant's claims] would be entirely speculative" [internal quotations marks omitted]), cert. denied, 549 U.S. 1212, 127 S. Ct. 1328, 167 L. Ed. 2d 85 (2007). Because the defendant provided no other evidence demonstrating that the victim's psychiatric records were necessary to his def......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Developments in Connecticut Criminal Law: 2007
...to review unpreserved search and seizure claims, recently recognized in State v. Brunetti, 279 Conn. 39, 55-56 (2006), cert. denied, 127 S. Ct. 1328 (2007)). 191. 281 Conn. 444 (2007). 192. Id. at 465. The court had first explained: "Like the Appellate Court, we decline to afford the state ......