Bryant v. State

Decision Date11 January 1973
Citation272 So.2d 297,289 Ala. 740
PartiesIn re WAYLAND EARL BRYANT AND RONALD WILLIAMS v. STATE Ex parte Wayland Earl Bryant and Ronald Williams SC 218
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

Certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals.

Ralph I. Knowles, Jr., Drake, Knowles & Still, University, for petitioners.

No brief for the State.

FAULKNER, Justice.

Petition of Wayland Earl Bryant and Ronald Williams for Certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that Court in Bryant and Williams v. State, 49 Ala.App. 359, 272 So.2d 286.

Writ denied.

HEFLIN, C.J., and MERRILL, HARWOOD and MADDOX, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
25 cases
  • Hill v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • April 18, 1978
    ... ... That is to say, evidence must tend to prove or disprove the issues before the jury. Slagle v. State, 39 Ala.App. 691, 108 So.2d 180 (1959). The determination of the relevancy or lack of relevancy of particular evidence rests largely in the sound discretion of the trial judge. Bryant v. State,49 Ala.App. 359, 272 So.2d 286 (1972), cert. denied 289 Ala. 740, 272 So.2d 297 (1973), cert. denied, 412 U.S. 922, 93 S.Ct. 2744, 37 L.Ed.2d 149 (1973). It is, therefore, the duty of the trial judge to limit evidence to the points in issue so that the attention of the jury is not ... ...
  • Duncan v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • March 29, 1983
    ... ... That is to say, evidence must tend to prove or disprove the issues before the jury. Slagle v. State, 39 Ala. 691, 108 So.2d 180 (1959). The determination of the relevancy or lack of relevancy of particular evidence rests largely in the sound discretion of the trial judge. Bryant v. State, 49 Ala.App. 359, 272 So.2d 286 (1972), cert. denied, 289 Ala. 740, 272 So.2d 297 (1973), ... Page 902 ... cert. denied, 412 U.S. 922, 93 S.Ct. 2744, 37 L.Ed.2d 149 (1974). It is, therefore, the duty of the trial judge to limit evidence to the points in issue so that the attention of ... ...
  • Hopkins v. State, 1 Div. 389
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • February 1, 1983
    ... ... Any good citizen would interpret this to mean a fair trial in which the guilt or innocence of defendants should be determined on the evidence ... ' " ...         Id. (quoting Powell v. State, 224 Ala. 540, 553, 141 So. 201, 213 (1932)). Similarly, in Bryant v. State, 49 Ala.App. 359, 272 So.2d 286 (1972), cert. denied, 289 Ala. 740, 272 So.2d 297, cert. denied, 412 U.S. 922, 93 S.Ct. 2744, 37 L.Ed.2d 149 (1973), the court held that the accused had not been denied a fair trial by elaborate security measures including the registration, photographing and ... ...
  • Beecher v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • October 1, 1974
    ... ... We have only the remark of counsel for defendant as to what testimony the argument was directed. Under such circumstances we must follow the presumption that the ruling of the trial court was correct. Bryant v. State, 49 Ala.App. 359, 272 So.2d 286, cert. den.289 Ala. 740, 272 ... Page 726 ... So.2d 297, cert. den. 412 U.S. 922, 93 S.Ct. 2744, 37 L.Ed.2d 149 ...         Certainly, there is not presented in this case the statutory approval of commenting on the failure of the defendant to ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT