Buckeye Retirement Co., L.L.C., Ltd. v. Lee
| Decision Date | 12 June 2007 |
| Docket Number | 261. |
| Citation | 837 N.Y.S.2d 641,2007 NY Slip Op 05166,41 A.D.3d 183 |
| Parties | BUCKEYE RETIREMENT CO., L.L.C., LTD., Appellant, v. WILLIAM G. LEE, III, Respondent. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
In 1990, a default judgment was entered in Florida in favor of plaintiff's predecessor in interest and against defendant in the amount of $8,658.69. In 2006, plaintiff moved, pursuant to CPLR 3213 for summary judgment in lieu of complaint, to domesticate that judgment, and sought interest at the rate of 12% per year. Although defendant did not respond, Supreme Court denied the motion because it could not determine (1) whether there was personal jurisdiction in the underlying Florida default judgment against defendant, a nonresident of Florida; (2) the Florida statute of limitations applicable to the enforcement of judgments; or (3) the basis for New York's personal jurisdiction over defendant, then a Nevada resident.
The Full Faith and Credit Clause of article IV of the United States Constitution requires the courts of New York to enforce judgments rendered in other states, and precludes inquiry into the merits of the judgment (see Fauntleroy v Lum, 210 US 230 [1908]). While lack of personal jurisdiction is a defense to enforcement of a sister state's judgment (see JDC Fin. Co. I v Patton, 284 AD2d 164, 166 [2001]), lack of personal jurisdiction and the statute of limitations are affirmative defenses that are waived unless raised by the aggrieved party (see Yihye v Blumenberg, 260 AD2d 371 [1999], lv denied 93 NY2d 813 [1999] [personal jurisdiction]; McGowan v Hoffmeister, 15 AD3d 297 [2005] [personal jurisdiction]; Fade v Pugliani/Fade, 8 AD3d 612, 614 [2004] [statute of limitations]). Accordingly, Supreme Court should not have raised them sua sponte.
We remand to Supreme Court to calculate the amount of interest, based on the New York rate (see Wells Fargo & Co. v Davis, 105 NY 670 [1887]; De Nunez v Bartels, 264 AD2d 565, 566 [1999]).
...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Horst v. Brown
...or in a pre-answer motion to dismiss. Defendant failed to do either, and thus waived this defense ( see Buckeye Retirement Co., L.L.C., Ltd. v. Lee, 41 A.D.3d 183, 837 N.Y.S.2d 641 [2007] [statute of limitations defense waived unless raised by aggrieved party] ). As defendant waived the aff......
-
Balboa Capital Corp. v. CKO Kick Boxing Mamaroneck LLC
...at New York rate on French judgment but waived the higher rate by failing to request it]; Buckeye Retirement Co., L.L.C., Ltd. v. Lee , 41 A.D.3d 183, 183, 837 N.Y.S.2d 641 [1st Dept. 2007] [on plaintiff's motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint to domesticate a Florida default jud......
-
TCA Global Credit Master Fund, L.P. v. Puresafe Water Sys., Inc.
...jurisdiction" of the rendering court ( Ho v. McCarthy, 90 A.D.3d at 711, 935 N.Y.S.2d 310 ; see Buckeye Retirement Co., L.L.C., Ltd. v. Lee, 41 A.D.3d 183, 184, 837 N.Y.S.2d 641 ; Rancho Santa Fe Assn. v. Dolan–King, 36 A.D.3d 460, 461, 829 N.Y.S.2d 39 ; GNOC Corp. v. Cappelletti, 208 A.D.2......
-
WOLVERINE Mut. Ins. Co. v. OLIVER
...(Mo.Ct.App.1994), trans. denied, cert. denied; Estabrook v. Baden, 284 Mont. 419, 943 P.2d 1334 (1997); Buckeye Ret. Co., L.L.C., Ltd., v. Lee, 41 A.D.3d 183, 837 N.Y.S.2d 641 (2007); Reddell v. Johnson, 942 P.2d 200 (Okla.1997); but see DaimlerChrysler Servs. North America, LLC v. Ouimette......