Bucklin v. Strickler
Decision Date | 02 July 1891 |
Citation | 32 Neb. 602,49 N.W. 371 |
Parties | BUCKLIN ET AL. v. STRICKLER. |
Court | Nebraska Supreme Court |
1. Service of summons set forth in the record held to be sufficient to confer jurisdiction.
2. Technical objections to the service of a summons must be specifically pointed out to justify the court in sustaining them.
3. A motion to quash a summons because of defects therein or in serving the same, should be confined to the defects complained of. If it go further, and pray for a dismissal of the case, it is a general appearance in the action, as it invokes the power of the court on a question other than that relating to jurisdiction.
Error to district court, Hamilton county; NORVAL, Judge.
Action for commissions by D. E. Bucklin and A. L. Kennedy against Conrad Strickler. Dismissed. Plaintiffs appeal. Reversed.E. J. Hainer and J. H. Smith, for plaintiffs in error.
Agee & Stevenson, for defendant in error.
This action was brought before a justice of the peace, who, on the motion of the defendant, dismissed the action for want of jurisdiction, the costs being taxed to the plaintiffs. The case was taken on error to the district court, where the judgment as to costs was reversed, and the judgment of dismissal affirmed. The transcript of the justice is as follows: “ ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
McLean v. McLean, 6631.
...the action is coupled with the appearance to quash the service, such motion is in fact a general appearance. In Bucklin et al. v. Strickler, 32 Neb. 602, 49 N.W. 371, 372, the defendant appeared and moved to quash the service of the summons and to dismiss the action. The court said: “the mo......
-
McLean v. McLean
...v. Boston Acme Mines Development Co. 72 Utah 137, 269 P. 147, 59 A.L.R. 1318; Everett v. Wilson, 34 Colo. 476, 83 P. 211; Bucklin v. Strickler, 32 Neb. 602, 49 N.W. 371; McKillip v. Harvey, 80 Neb. 264, 114 N.W. King v. Ingels, 121 Kan. 790, 250 P. 306; Yorke v. Yorke, 3 N.D. 343, 55 N.W. 1......
-
The State ex rel. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Grimm
... ... 207; Handy v. Ins. Co., 37 ... Ohio St. 366; McKillup v. Hansey, 80 Neb. 264; ... Dudley v. White, 44 Fla. 264; Bucklin v ... Strickler, 32 Neb. 602; Welch v. Ayres, 43 Neb ... 326; Teater v. King, 35 Wash. 138; Everett v ... Wilson, 34 Colo. 476; Graham ... ...
-
Application of Goodrich Public Service Commission of Wyoming v. Russell
...Fitzgerald, 137 U.S. 98, 11 S.Ct. 36, 34 L.Ed. 608; Sayward v. Carlson, 1 Wash. 29, 23 P. 830; 2 Enc. Plead. & Prac. 625; Bucklin v. Strickler, 32 Neb. 602, 49 N.W. 371." in Bucklin v. Strickler, 32 Neb. 602, 49 N.W. 371, the Supreme Court of Nebraska announced a similar rule through an opi......