Buckner
| Decision Date | 14 November 2000 |
| Citation | 35 S.W.3d 417 |
| Parties | (Mo.App. W.D. 2000) . Lenford A. Buckner, Appellant v. State of Missouri, Respondent. Case Number: WD57885 Missouri Court of Appeals Western District Handdown Date: |
| Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
17 cases
-
Smith v. Sachse
...strategy do not provide a basis for post-conviction relief. Maberry v. State, 137 S.W.3d 543, 547-48 (Mo.App. 2004); Buckner v. State, 35 S.W.3d 417, 421 (Mo.App. 2000). When trial counsel has testified to his or her trial strategy and the motion court finds counsel credible and counsel's s......
-
Jones v. Steele
...925, 927 (Mo.banc 2002). If movant fails to satisfy either prong of the test the other need not be considered. Buckner v. State, 35 S.W.3d 417, 420 (Mo.App.W.D. 2000). Movant must overcome a strong presumption that counsel's conduct was reasonable and effective to meet the first prong of th......
-
Waiksnis v. Cassady
...competent attorney would perform under similar circumstances," and (ii) he was prejudiced by counsel's failure. Buckner v. State, 35 S.W.3d 417, 420 (Mo. App. W.D. 2000). If either prong of this test, derived from Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (......
-
Bice v. Lewis
...been a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.Buckner v. State, 35 S.W.3d 417, 421 (Mo. App. 2000) (citations omitted). On direct appeal, this Court previously concluded that the evidence of [Bice]'s guilt was overwhelmi......
Request a trial to view additional results