Bueno v. State, 39911

Decision Date14 December 1966
Docket NumberNo. 39911,39911
Citation409 S.W.2d 421
PartiesOscar BUENO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
CourtTexas Court of Criminal Appeals

Marvin Foster, Jr., Corpus Christi, for appellant.

Sam Jones, Dist. Atty., Douglas Tinker, Asst. Dist. Atty., Corpus Christi, and Leon B. Douglas, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION

MORRISON, Presiding Judge.

The offense is robbery by assault with a prior non-capital felony conviction alleged for enhancement; the punishment, life.

In a brief filed in the trial court the appellant, without the citation of authority, makes several allegations of error. An examination of this lengthy record reveals that practically all of the inadmissible evidence about which complaint is made was elicited by appellant's counsel and much of it developed in the absence of the jury. We have concluded that it would serve no worthwhile purpose to discuss the possibility of error had this evidence been introduced by the State.

We find no error in the court's charge.

The indictment returned by the Nueces County Grand Jury against appellant charged two prior convictions. Proof of only one was permitted. The primary offense was alleged and proven to have been committed on September 25, 1965. The prior conviction proven was on January 13, 1961. Under the holdings of this Court in Covarrubias v. State, 169 Tex.Cr.R. 288, 334 S.W.2d 187; Haines v. State, 391 S.W.2d 58; and Wilson v. State, 398 S.W.2d 291, this is sufficient.

Finding no reversible error, the judgment is affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Bueno v. Beto
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • 27 Abril 1972
    ...arguing that the line-up was constitutionally defective. Each time this issue has been litigated, appellant has lost. Bueno v. State, 409 S.W. 2d 421 (Tex.Cr.App.1966) On appeal appellant raises the following A—The testimony of witnesses Hernandez, Jimenez and Munoz identifying him as one o......
  • Nacol v. State, 58244
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • 14 Noviembre 1979
    ...witnesses who testified that they contributed to that fund. Appellant cannot now complain on appeal of that evidence. Bueno v. State, 409 S.W.2d 421 (Tex.Cr.App.1966). Further, appellant's change of venue motion was granted because of the presence in the community of those In Emerson v. Sta......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT