Bunch v. American Cigar Co.
| Decision Date | 30 October 1923 |
| Docket Number | 11314. |
| Citation | 119 S.E. 828,126 S.C. 324 |
| Parties | BUNCH ET AL. v. AMERICAN CIGAR CO. |
| Court | South Carolina Supreme Court |
Appeal from Common Pleas Circuit Court of Charleston County; I. W Bowman, Judge.
Action by Ethel Bunch and another against the American Cigar Company. From an order of nonsuit, plaintiffs appeal. Reversed, and case remanded for new trial.
Whaley Barnwell & Grimball, of Charleston, for appellants.
Hagood Rivers & Young, of Charleston, for respondent.
Action for damages on account of personal injury sustained by the plaintiff Ethel Bunch, at the time an employee of the defendant. Her husband was joined as a party plaintiff.
The appeal is from an order of nonsuit.
The evidence for the plaintiff tended to establish the following facts, the inferences from which will be taken most strongly in favor of the plaintiff, as we are bound to do upon an appeal from an order of nonsuit.
The plaintiff Ethel Bunch, as an employee of the defendant company, was engaged at work on the fourth floor of the building. She knocked off work at 5 o'clock p. m. The day was dark and cloudy, and there was no light at the door leading to the staircase and none on the staircase. The door was about two steps from the head of the staircase. About three steps from the door which leads to the staircase there was a splotch of oil upon the floor. In passing to the door she stepped upon the splotch of oil and some of it stuck to her shoe. As she descended the stairs, she slipped and fell halfway down the stairs and sustained personal injuries. The slipping and fall were due to the oil upon her shoe.
If without her fault she stepped into the oil and a part of it adhered to her shoe, causing her to slip and fall, in descending the stairs, it is the same in principle as if the oil had been spilt upon the steps, and brings the case within the doctrine so often declared by this court that if an injury is shown to have resulted from an unsafe place to work, a prima facie case of negligence is made out against the master, and the burden of exculpating himself is cast upon him. See the cases cited in the note hereto, taken from the appellants' argument, which the reporter will append, giving full titles. [1] It was error to grant the nonsuit.
The order is reversed, and the case remanded for a new trial.
---------
Notes:
[1] The cases referred to in the opinion follow: Gunter v. Mfg. Co., 18 S.C. 262, 44 Am. Rep. 573; Lasure v. Mfg. Co., 18...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Hopkins v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.
...facie case was made out. The same is true of Branch v. Railroad Co., 35 S.C. 405, 14 S.E. 808, Lasure v. Mfg. Co., 18 S.C. 275, Bunch v. Amer. Co., 126 S.C. 324, 119 S.W. 828, cited. In the case of Lester v. Railroad Co., 93 S.C. 395, 76 S.E. 976, also cited, the doctrine declared was expli......
-
Whisenhunt v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.
... ... running board about the middle of the top of said car one J ... E. Bunch, an engine carpenter, and his helper, P. A. Antley, ... employees of defendant, without any notice ... Company, 151 S.C. 280, 148 S.E. 870 ... In ... Price v. American Agricultural Chemical Company et ... al., 173 S.C. 518, 176 S.E. 352, 355, the clear language ... the master, and he has the burden of exculpating ... himself." Bunch et al. v. American Cigar ... Company, 126 S.C. 324, 119 S.E. 828 ... Nuckolls ... v. Great Atlantic & ... ...
-
Veronee v. Charleston Consol. Ry. & Lighting Co.
... ... 398, 52 S.E. 45; Cannon v. Lockhart Mills, 101 S.C ... 59, 85 S.E. 233; Bunch v. American Cigar Co., 126 ... S.C. 324, 119 S.E. 828; Harwell v. Columbia Mills, ... 112 S.C ... ...
-
Mullikin v. Southern Bleachery & Print Works
... ... for a directed verdict. See Bunch v. American Cigar ... Co., 126 S.C. 324, 119 S.E. 828; Cannon v. Lockhart ... Mills, 101 S.C. 59, ... ...