Buncombe County v. Penland

Decision Date21 March 1934
Docket Number70.
Citation173 S.E. 609,206 N.C. 299
PartiesBUNCOMBE COUNTY v. PENLAND et ux.
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court

Appeal from Superior Court, Buncombe County; McElroy, Judge.

Action by the County of Buncombe against J. A. Penland and wife, in which A. P. Grice, trustee, and R. M. Wendell entered an appearance and made motions. From an adverse judgment movants appeal.

Reversed.

This is an action brought by plaintiff against defendants to foreclose a certificate of tax sale of a certain lot in Buncombe county, N. C., "listed as the property of J. A Penland," for $317.50. The record discloses affidavit of publication which contains "due search made and the defendants, J. A. Penland and wife, Addie Penland, cannot be found in Buncombe County." Publication is ordered and notice of publication is set forth. Judgment appointing a commissioner and ordering sale and notice of publication set forth. Report of sale, confirmation and decree "County of Buncombe, who became the highest bidder for cash thereof for the sum of $413.13." Assignment of bid to Auburn-Asheville Company for $413.13 and request to commissioner to make deed, A. P. Grice, trustee, and R. M Wendell entered a special appearance and made motion "Now come A. P. Grice, Trustee, and R. M. Wendell, and enter a special appearance in this action for the sole purpose of moving the Court for an appropriate order and decree (a) setting aside, cancelling and striking from the records that certain purported deed from Lamar Galloway, Commissioner, to Auburn-Asheville Company, dated the ----- day of May, 1932, and recorded in the office of the Register of Deeds of Buncombe County, North Carolina, in Deed Book 454, page 28, as constituting a cloud on the legal and equitable titles to the land and premises hereinafter described, (b) vacating and setting aside the interlocutory judgment and the purported confirmation of the attempted foreclosure sale herein, (c) striking out the purported and attempted affidavit and order of publication, (d) striking out the sheriff's return on the summons, and (e) dismissing the action for want of jurisdiction of the court; and the said moving parties expressly save and reserve all of their rights in this behalf. For the purpose hereof, the moving parties respectfully show the Court:

"That A. P. Grice, Trustee, is a citizen and resident of the City of Norfolk, Virginia, and is the owner and holder of the legal title to the land and premises hereinafter described, under and by virtue of a conveyance of the same by J. H. Morris and Ruth H. Morris, his wife, by a certain deed in trust, dated the 15th day of April, 1928, and duly recorded in said Register's office in Book of Mortgages and Deeds in Trust No. 285, page 339, and that R. M. Wendell is a citizen and resident of Buncombe County, N. C., and is the lawful owner and holder of the equitable title to said land and premises under and by virtue of a conveyance thereof, by J. H. Morris and Ruth H. Morris, his wife, by a certain deed dated September 8, 1928, and duly recorded in said Register's office in Deed Book 396. page 262, which said deed in trust and deed, and the records thereof, are hereby specifically referred to and made parts hereof. *** That said lands and premises have a present actual market value of at least $12,000.00, as nearly as the moving parties can ascertain the same. That the moving parties had no knowledge of the pendency of this action prior to the 29th day of August, 1932, on which date it was discovered that a purported corporation, known as Auburn Asheville Company, had, on August 24, 1932, recorded an alleged deed to said land and premises in pursuance of this action, and that subsequently, on the 10th day of September, 1932, the moving parties brought a civil action in this Court against the said Auburn Asheville Company for the purpose of removing its claim under the said alleged deed as a cloud on the legal and equitable titles of the moving parties to said land and premises."

The moving parties pray that the court make "appropriate order and decree" on the grounds: "That the 1928 tax list upon which this action was predicated is erroneous, irregular and utterly false, for that it purports to show that the defendant, J. A. Penland, was the owner of said land and premises on the 1st day of May, 1928, whereas neither the said defendant nor his wife and co-defendant, Addie Penland, ever owned the said land and premises or any right, title, interest, estate or equity therein or thereto, the said tax list having been made and signed in the name of J. A. Penland, but without his knowledge or consent, by one J. H. Morris, who at that time was the true owner of said land and premises, and who should have listed the same in his own name."

Various other grounds are set forth and that the whole foreclosure procedure is irregular, illegal, and void. In the record is also the following: "And movants further move the court that the said Auburn-Asheville Company be made a party to this proceeding for the purpose hereof."

Notice of the special appearance and motion was duly served on the county of Buncombe, J. A. Penland, Addie Penland, and the Auburn-Asheville Company. The county of Buncombe answered admitting and denying certain of the allegations made by the movants. It admitted: "That no personal service was had on the defendants, but the plaintiff alleges that service was made by publication as is provided by law. *** The plaintiff expressly alleging that each and every part of the foreclosure proceeding in question was carried out in accordance with the provisions of the statutes of North Carolina. *** Wherefore, the plaintiff prays the Court that the special appearance and motion of the said A. P. Grice, Trustee, and R. M. Wendell, be dismissed."

The court below made the following order and decree: "This cause coming on to be heard before His Honor, P. A. McElroy, Judge Presiding and holding the Courts of the 19th Judicial District, at this the September, 1933, Term, on the special appearance and motion of A. P. Grice, Trustee, and R. M. Wendell, lodged in said cause for the purpose of securing an appropriate order and decree by the Court setting aside and cancelling a certain deed from Lamar Galloway, Commissioner, to Auburn-Asheville Company, dated the ----- day of May, 1932, and recorded in the office of the Register of Deeds of Buncombe County, North Carolina, in Deed Book 454, at page 28, and for other purposes specifically set out in said special appearance and motion, and being heard upon the arguments of counsel for the said movants, and for said Auburn-Asheville Company, and it appearing from the record herein that said A. P. Grice, Trustee, and R. M. Wendell, have never been made parties to this cause, and that said Auburn-Asheville Company has never been made a party hereto, by reason whereof the Court is of the opinion that the said movants are not entitled at the present time, under the existing state of the record, to have their said motion heard upon the merits thereof. It is now, therefore, upon motion, considered, ordered, adjudged and decreed that said special appearance and motion be and the same is hereby dismissed at the cost of said movants, to be taxed by the Clerk."

The movants, A. P. Grice, trustee, and R. M. Wendell, excepted and assigned error to the judgment as signed, and appealed to the Supreme Court.

Carter & Carter, of Asheville, for appellants A. P. Grice and R. M. Wendell.

CLARKSON Justice.

The question involved: Where land is sold in an action to foreclose certificate of tax sale under N.C. Code 1931 (Michie) § 8037, and the owners are not named as parties defendant, but appear specially, does the court have the power and authority to hear and determine their motion to set aside and vacate the proceedings, on the ground that the same is void for want of jurisdiction and make additional party? We think so under the facts and circumstances of this case, as the appearance was general and the motion could be made. This action is brought to foreclose a certificate of tax sale on a certain lot in Buncombe county, N.C. In N.C. Code of 1931 (Michie) § 8037, is the following: "Such relief shall be afforded only in an action in the nature of an action to foreclose a mortgage," et cetera.

N.C. Code of 1931 (Michie), part section 593, the clerk, under a foreclosure proceeding, "May issue writs of assistance and possession upon ten days notice to parties in possession."

The movants contend that they have the legal and equitable title to the lot in controversy. If the real owner is in possession, the purchaser at the foreclosure sale could seek a "Writ of assistance" and dispossess him. Further, it is contended that the attempted foreclosure proceeding is a cloud on movants' title.

N.C. Practice and Procedure in Civil cases (McIntosh), speaking to foreclosure proceedings at page 217, we find: "As to prior and subsequent incumbrancers, it is generally held that, if the purpose of the proceeding is to get a sale of the property discharged of all liens so that a purchaser will be protected, it is necessary that they should be made parties. The prior mortgagee has the first right and if the land is sold at the suit of a subsequent mortgagee, the purchaser will take it subject to the lien of the prior mortgage. If subsequent mortgagees are not made parties, it was formerly held that the sale of the land would discharge their liens, which would be transferred to the fund received; but it is now held that subsequent mortgagees or lienholders are not bound by the action unless they are made parties, and that they would still have the right to redeem."

Jones v. Williams. 155 N.C. 179, 71 S.E. 222, 36 L. R. A. (N. S.) 426; Madison County...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT