Burgess v. United States, No. 06–11429.
| Court | United States Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | Justice GINSBURG delivered the opinion of the Court. |
| Citation | 08 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4470,2008 Daily Journal D.A.R. 5428,76 USLW 4225,553 U.S. 124,128 S.Ct. 1572,30 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 737,21 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 185,170 L.Ed.2d 478 |
| Parties | Keith Lavon BURGESS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES. |
| Docket Number | No. 06–11429. |
| Decision Date | 16 April 2008 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
276 practice notes
-
Bridges v. Poe, 7:19-cv-00529-LSC
...statute, that definition "declares what the term means ... [and] ... excludes any meaning that is not stated." Burgess v. United States , 553 U.S. 124, 130, 128 S.Ct. 1572, 170 L.Ed.2d 478 (2008) (quoting Colautti v. Franklin , 439 U.S. 379, 392–393, n.10, 99 S.Ct. 675, 58 L.Ed.2d 596 (1979......
-
Premier Health Care Invs., LLC v. Uhs of Anchor, L.P., S19G1491
...at 31, 779 S.E.2d 263 (quoting OCGA § 16-12-100.1 (a) (3) (B) (2011)) (emphasis supplied).10 See also, e.g., Burgess v. United States , 553 U.S. 124, 131 n.3, 128 S.Ct. 1572, 170 L.Ed.2d 478 (2008) (noting that "[t]he word ‘includes’ is usually a term of enlargement, and not of limitation. ......
-
United States v. White, No. 5:17-HC-2162-D
...rather than exhaustive." Samantar v. Yousuf, 560 U.S. 305, 317, 130 S.Ct. 2278, 176 L.Ed.2d 1047 (2010) ; see Burgess v. United States, 553 U.S. 124, 131 n.3, 128 S.Ct. 1572, 170 L.Ed.2d 478 (2008). Thus, section 4247(c) permits a court in a section 4248 proceeding to order that a psychiatr......
-
U.S. v. Farhane, Docket Nos. 07–1968–cr (L)
...but to inform the question of what in fact suffices to provide oneself as personnel, a “blank to be filled.” Burgess v. United States, 553 U.S. 124, 130–32, 128 S.Ct. 1572, 170 L.Ed.2d 478 (2008) (evaluating a statutorily defined term in “context” and in light of how the term “is commonly d......
Request a trial to view additional results
269 cases
-
Bridges v. Poe, 7:19-cv-00529-LSC
...statute, that definition "declares what the term means ... [and] ... excludes any meaning that is not stated." Burgess v. United States , 553 U.S. 124, 130, 128 S.Ct. 1572, 170 L.Ed.2d 478 (2008) (quoting Colautti v. Franklin , 439 U.S. 379, 392–393, n.10, 99 S.Ct. 675, 58 L.Ed.2d 596 (1979......
-
Premier Health Care Invs., LLC v. Uhs of Anchor, L.P., S19G1491
...at 31, 779 S.E.2d 263 (quoting OCGA § 16-12-100.1 (a) (3) (B) (2011)) (emphasis supplied).10 See also, e.g., Burgess v. United States , 553 U.S. 124, 131 n.3, 128 S.Ct. 1572, 170 L.Ed.2d 478 (2008) (noting that "[t]he word ‘includes’ is usually a term of enlargement, and not of limitation. ......
-
United States v. White, No. 5:17-HC-2162-D
...rather than exhaustive." Samantar v. Yousuf, 560 U.S. 305, 317, 130 S.Ct. 2278, 176 L.Ed.2d 1047 (2010) ; see Burgess v. United States, 553 U.S. 124, 131 n.3, 128 S.Ct. 1572, 170 L.Ed.2d 478 (2008). Thus, section 4247(c) permits a court in a section 4248 proceeding to order that a psychiatr......
-
U.S. v. Farhane, Docket Nos. 07–1968–cr (L)
...but to inform the question of what in fact suffices to provide oneself as personnel, a “blank to be filled.” Burgess v. United States, 553 U.S. 124, 130–32, 128 S.Ct. 1572, 170 L.Ed.2d 478 (2008) (evaluating a statutorily defined term in “context” and in light of how the term “is commonly d......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Guest Post – Second Circuit Rejects Manufacturer’s Plan to Share Cost of Expensive Drug with Medicare Part D Beneficiaries
...such as, offering kickbacks, bribes, or corrupt rebates. Not so, said the court. Quoting the Supreme Court in Burgess v. United States, 553 U.S. 124, 131 n.3 (2008), the court explained that “the word ‘includes,’ when used in a statute, ‘is usually a term of enlargement, and not of limitati......
1 books & journal articles
-
THE DEFENDER GENERAL.
...557 U.S. 305 (2009); Waddington v. Sarausad, 555 U.S. 179 (2009); Kennedy v. Louisiana, 554 U.S. 407 (2008); Burgess v. United States, 553 U.S. 124 (2008); Burton v. Stewart, 549 U.S. 147 (2007); United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez, 548 U.S. 140 (2006); Davis v. Washington, 547 U.S. 813 (2006);......