Burguieres v. Farrell
Decision Date | 06 September 1935 |
Docket Number | No. 13199.,13199. |
Citation | 85 S.W.2d 952 |
Parties | BURGUIERES v. FARRELL et al.<SMALL><SUP>*</SUP></SMALL> |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Tarrant County; Marvin H. Brown, Judge.
Suit by Stella B. Burguieres against John E. Farrell and another. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals and, preliminary to a hearing of the appeal, moves to disqualify Justice H. S. Lattimore from acting as one of the judges in the disposition of the appeal.
Motion to disqualify overruled, and judgment affirmed.
Slay & Simon, of Fort Worth, for appellant.
Cantey, Hanger & McMahon, Mark McMahon, Gillis A. Johnson, and Warren Scarborough, all of Fort Worth, for appellees.
On Motion to Disqualify Justice H. S. Lattimore.
In the above-entitled suit Mrs. Stella Burguieres has prosecuted an appeal from a judgment of the district court of the Ninety-Sixth judicial district, denying her petition in the nature of a bill of review to set aside that portion of a judgment theretofore rendered by the same court in a former suit by her for divorce against her former husband, John E. Farrell, in which she was divested of her interest in the community estate of herself and said Farrell and same vested in him in accordance with a written agreement of the parties to that suit on file therein; and also to cancel said written agreement. The grounds for that relief are set out in her petition in the nature of a bill of review. That appeal is now pending in this court. As shown by allegations in plaintiff's petition, the former suit for divorce and property settlement, instituted by her, was tried before Hon. Hal S. Lattimore, the regular elected judge of said court, who granted the divorce and also decreed the property settlement now complained of. After the divorce was granted, plaintiff married again to Alfred L. Burguieres, but she was by order of court given leave to institute and prosecute her present suit to set aside the former judgment of property settlement in her present married name of Stella Burguieres without joinder by her husband. But no effort was made to set aside the decree of divorce. As shown by the record, the suit now on appeal was tried before Hon. Marvin H. Brown, who had succeeded Hon. Hal S. Lattimore as judge of the same court. Both of said judges are now associate justices of this court; and appellant has filed a motion to disqualify Justice Lattimore from acting as one of the justices in the disposition of the appeal which is now pending.
The facts alleged in and made the basis of the motion to disqualify were developed in the trial of the case now on appeal and relate to what occurred after judgment in the divorce case had been entered and are as follows:
Testimony of Judge Lattimore given on the trial of the present suit to set aside the property settlement:
Testimony of J. E. Farrell:
Article 5, § 11, of the Constitution reads:
In support of the motion now before us, appellant has cited decisions in which it was held that trial judges were disqualified to try cases because prior to the time the same were tried they had to some extent acted as counsel in advising the litigants in matters involved in those cases. Among the cases cited are the following: Slaven v. Wheeler, 58 Tex. 23; Barnes v. State, 47 Tex. Cr. R. 461, 83 S. W. 1124; Durham v. State, 58 Tex. Cr. R. 143, 124 S. W. 932; Johnson v. Johnson (Tex. Civ. App.) 89 S. W. 1102.
In Gaines v. Hindman (Tex. Civ. App.) 74 S. W. 583, this was said:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Avila v. St. Luke's Lutheran Hosp.
...334, 295 S.W.2d 890, 893 (1956). It is as conclusive as any other judgment as to the matters adjudicated, Burguieres v. Farrell, 85 S.W.2d 952, 964 (Tex.Civ.App.--Ft. Worth 1935), writ dism'd, 126 Tex. 209, 87 S.W.2d 463 (1935), but it is binding only as to the parties to the agreement and ......
-
Kimmell v. Tipton
...stated, be bound by his own affirmative testimony given in his oral deposition read in evidence in the case." In Burguieres v. Farrell (Tex.Civ. App.) 85 S.W.2d 952, 972, the court "It is a wholesome rule, and should assuredly be applied in suits in equity, that the testimony given and admi......
-
Brownson v. New, 12485
...judgment attacked. Alexander v. Hagedorn, 148 Tex. 565, 226 S.W.2d 996; Smith v. Ferrell, Tex.Com.App., 44 S.W.2d 962; Burguieres v. Farrell, Tex.Civ.App., 85 S.W.2d 952, writ dismissed, 126 Tex. 209, 87 S.W.2d 463, but the husband is by law the manager of the community estate, and a trust ......
-
Carver v. Huff
...Bagby v. Bagby, Tex.Civ.App., 186 S.W.2d 702; 15 Tex.Jur. 584.' The rule there announced has support in the case of Burguieres v. Farrell, Tex.Civ.App., 85 S.W.2d 952-976, concurring opinion by Justice Brown. Under the record presented and the law applicable thereto it appears that appellan......