Burnett v. Rome Railway & Light Co.

Decision Date20 January 1910
Docket Number2,202.
Citation66 S.E. 803,7 Ga.App. 323
PartiesBURNETT v. ROME RY. & LIGHT CO.
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

Syllabus by the Court.

The petition alleged that the plaintiff, who was an old lady, unacquainted with the streets or their condition in the city of Rome, where the defendant operates a line of street cars, took passage on one of the cars, and made a contract with the conductor, in consideration of the fare of five cents, to convey her as a passenger from that point to Cherokee street, in South Rome; that the conductor failed to comply with his contract, and did not carry her to Cherokee street, but put her off the car at East Third street, and gave her a transfer, by which she was compelled to walk a quarter of a mile to another car; "that in going to said car petitioner fell, dislocated her hip, and broke her hip;" that, if she had known that she could not have been carried to South Rome without having to walk this distance, she, on account of her age, infirmity, and defective eyesight, would have employed a hack, or other means, and would not have attempted to get on the car. No direct connection between the defendant and the fall is alleged. The plaintiff sues for the personal injury received through the fall. Held, that the defendant's wrong, if any, was not the proximate cause of the injury, that the petition does not state a cause of action, and that it was properly dismissed on demurrer. Central Ry. Co. v. Price, 106 Ga. 176, 32 S.E. 77, 43 L.R.A. 402, 71 Am.St.Rep. 246; Central Ry. Co. v. Edwards, 111 Ga. 528, 36 S.E. 810.

Error from City Court of Floyd County; Harper Hamilton, Judge.

Action by W. T. Burnett against the Rome Railway & Light Company. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error. Affirmed.

M. B. Eubanks and W. B. Mebane, for plaintiff in error.

Dean & Dean, for defendant in error.

POWELL, J.

Judgment affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Burnett v. Rome Ry. & Light Co
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • January 20, 1910
    ... ... St. Rep. 246; Central Ry. Co. v. Edwards, 111 Ga. 528, 36 S. E. 810.[Ed. Note.For other cases, see Carriers, Cent. Dig. 1132-1146; Dee. Dig. 305.*](Syllabus by the Court.)Error from City Court of Floyd County; Harper Hamilton, Judge.Action by W. T. Burnett against the Rome Railway & Light Company. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error. Affirmed.M. B. Eubanks and W. B. Mebane, for plaintiff in error.Dean & Dean, for defendant in error.POWELL, J. Judgment ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT