Burnham v. Stevens
Decision Date | 24 May 1912 |
Citation | 98 N.E. 603,212 Mass. 165 |
Parties | BURNHAM et al. v. STEVENS. |
Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
Roger F. Sturgis, of Boston, for petitioner.
Jas. M Swift, Atty. Gen., and Fred T. Field, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the Commonwealth.
The question in this case is whether the trust estate is liable to a succession tax under the provisions of St. 1909, c. 527 § 8, or of St. 1907, c. 563, codified as part 4, c. 490, St 1909. The probate court held that it was liable to such tax under the provisions of St. 1909, c. 527, § 8, and entered a decree accordingly. The petitioner appealed. The case was reserved by a single justice for this court 'upon the pleadings, decree, claim of appeal therefrom, and objections thereto, and agreed statement of facts.'
We think that the decree of the probate court was right and should be affirmed. The terms of the indenture of trust under which the question arises are so far as material as follows:
John A. Burnham was the son of the settlor and died November 10, 1910, without having exercised the power. At the time of his death he was a resident of this state. He left three children, amongst whom the trust estate is not to be divided. The indenture of trust was dated October 30, 1869.
The statute is as follows: 'Whenever any person shall exercise a power of appointment derived from any disposition of property made prior to September first, nineteen hundred and seven, such appointment when made shall be deemed to be a disposition of property by the person exercising such power taxable under the provisions of chapter five hundred and sixty-three of the acts of the year nineteen hundred and seven, and of all acts in amendment thereof and in addition thereto, in the same manner as though the property to which such appointment relates belonged absolutely to the donee of such power, and had been bequeathed or devised by the donee by will; and whenever any person possessing such a power of appointment so derived shall omit or fail to exercise the same within the time provided therefor, in whole or in part, a disposition of property taxable under the provisions of chapter five hundred and sixty-three of the acts of the year nineteen hundred and seven and all acts in amendment thereof and in addition thereto shall be deemed to take place to the extent of such omission or failure in the same manner as though the persons or corporations thereby becoming entitled to the possession or enjoyment of the property to which such power related had succeeded thereto by a will of the donee of the power failing to exercise such power, taking effect at the time...
To continue reading
Request your trial