Burns v. State, CASE NO. 1D15–5195

Decision Date23 March 2017
Docket NumberCASE NO. 1D15–5195
Citation212 So.3d 546 (Mem)
Parties Phillip Dewayne BURNS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Diana L. Johnson of Johnson and Lufrano, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Tayo Popoola, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Phillip Burns challenges his judgment of conviction and sentences for attempted second degree murder and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. We affirm the convictions without comment, but vacate his sentences because the trial court believed, given our prior precedent, that the sentences imposed pursuant to section 775.087(2), Florida Statutes, had to be consecutive sentences. As Burns discharged a firearm striking a single victim and as both offenses arose out of a single criminal episode, consecutive sentences were permissible but not required. See Williams v. State , 186 So.3d 989 (Fla. 2016), and Tate v. State , 194 So.3d 564 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016) ; but see Torres–Rios v. State , 205 So.3d 883 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016) (holding concurrent sentences are required under section 775.087(2) when there was only a single discharge of a firearm and only one person shot during a single criminal episode).

The judgment of conviction is AFFIRMED, but the sentences are VACATED and the cause is REMANDED for resentencing; we certify conflict with Torres–Rios .

B.L. THOMAS, OSTERHAUS, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Wanless v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • May 6, 2019
    ...court went on to hold that—"based on Williams ,"—consecutive sentences are permissible in that circumstance. Id. at 412. Similarly, in Burns v. State , this court applied Williams and held that consecutive mandatory-minimum sentences were allowed after attempted second-degree murder and fel......
  • Fleming v. State, CASE NO. 1D12–5661
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • June 27, 2017
    ...(Fla. 2016) ; Williams v. State , 186 So.3d 989 (Fla. 2016) ; Tate v. State , 194 So.3d 564 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016) ; and Burns v. State , 212 So.3d 546 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017). We again certify conflict with Torres–Rios v. State , 205 So.3d 883 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016).As the trial court believed it wa......
  • Miller v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • August 14, 2017
    ...crimes involved only one victim who sustained only one physical injury.In line with our precedent outlined in Burns v. State, 212 So.3d 546 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017), and Wilson v. State, 219 So.3d 931 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017), we therefore REVERSE and REMAND appellant's sentences for the trial court ......
  • Jackson v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • August 14, 2017
    ...crimes involved only one victim who sustained only one physical injury.In line with our precedent outlined in Burns v. State, 212 So.3d 546 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) and Wilson v. State, 219 So.3d 931 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017), we therefore REVERSE and REMAND appellant's sentences for the trial court t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT