Burns v. State, 16919.

Decision Date17 October 1934
Docket NumberNo. 16919.,16919.
Citation76 S.W.2d 516
PartiesBURNS v. STATE.
CourtTexas Court of Criminal Appeals

Appeal from District Court, Bowie County; R. H. Harvey, Judge.

Leonard Burns was convicted of murder, and he appeals.

Affirmed.

Otto Atchley, of New Boston, for appellant.

Elmer L. Lincoln, Dist. Atty., of Texarkana, and Lloyd W. Davidson, State's Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is murder; the punishment, death.

It was charged in the indictment, in substance, that appellant, with malice aforethought, killed James S. Ashford by shooting him with a gun.

On the night of December 11, 1933, deceased and his wife were sitting near a window in their living room when appellant approached with a shotgun and fired through the window. The shot struck deceased in the back of the head, and he died from the effects of the wound the following day.

Testifying in his own behalf, appellant admitted upon direct examination that he fired the shot that killed deceased. He said: "I killed Mr. Ashford (deceased), and the reason I did it was that they (meaning deceased and the son of deceased) were going to kill me." We quote from appellant's confession as follows: "Last night, December 11, 1933, I made up my mind that I would go and kill Jim Ashford (deceased). After supper I asked Eugene Legg if he would make a little drive with me. He said he would. I put my shotgun in his car and buckled my pistol on me. * * * I got out of the car about Hugh Ashford's place. I walked south and got over the yard fence in the southwest corner of the front yard fence. I then went to the front of the house, and stood in front of it, on the ground, raised my gun, and fired through the window. I saw him in the room before I shot, and at the time I shot I shot to kill him, and aimed the gun at him. * * * I had five buckshot shells with me and used one of them when I shot Mr. Ashford."

Testifying for the state, Eugene Legg stated that he went with appellant to a point near the home of deceased on the occasion in question and that appellant was armed with a shotgun; that after the car stopped appellant took the gun and left the car; that he (the witness) remained in the car; that he heard a shot and some hollering; that when appellant returned and while they were driving home he asked appellant who it was that was making the fuss; that appellant replied that it was Mrs. Ashford (the wife of deceased); that appellant said that he had "turned Mr. Ashford over" and that if they were caught he (appellant) would assume the responsibility.

It appears from the evidence that appellant had an insane brother who, because of having been a World War veteran, was drawing $100 a month from the Veterans' Administration; that the deceased was guardian of the estate of the insane brother; that a controversy arose between appellant and deceased over the amount of money charged by deceased for the care of the ward and the allowance to the ward's mother; that appellant attempted to require deceased to make an accounting, but failed. It was the state's theory, supported by the evidence, that this controversy caused appellant to entertain feelings of ill will toward deceased.

Bills of exception 1 and 2 disclose that the district attorney asked the attending physicians to describe in detail the wounds found upon the body of deceased. Before the question was asked, appellant,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Beard v. State, 22335.
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • April 7, 1943
    ...kind, character, or amount of relevant testimony which the state may introduce upon a plea of guilty." In the case of Burns v. State, 127 Tex. Cr.R. 356, 76 S.W.2d 516, appellant admitted that he had shot deceased, and that the wounds caused death; nevertheless the State was allowed to show......
  • Parkman v. State, 23171.
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • December 5, 1945
    ...case, cut it off from making proof thereof. 42 Tex.Jur. 78, Sec. 55; Beard v. State, 144 Tex.Cr.R. 546, 171 S.W.2d 869; Burns v. State, 127 Tex.Cr.R. 356, 76 S.W.2d 516; Reeves v. State, 116 Tex.Cr. R. 451, 32 S.W.2d 471. By special requested charge, appellant sought to have the jury instru......
  • Taylor v. State, 22330.
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • December 9, 1942
    ...mitigate it in order to show that the same was committed with malice aforethought. Hence we overrule his contention. See Burns v. State, 127 Tex.Cr.R. 356, 76 S.W.2d 516, and cases therein By bill of exception No. 2 appellant contends that the District Attorney, on cross-examination of the ......
  • Ridinger v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • June 16, 1943
    ...this and brings it forward in bills of exception. No error is shown. Curtis v. State, 119 Tex.Cr.R. 398, 46 S.W. 2d 303; Burns v. State, 127 Tex.Cr.R. 356, 76 S.W.2d 516, and Rex Beard v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 171 S.W.2d 869, not yet reported [in State The prosecuting witness testified that h......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT