Burrell v. Michaux
Decision Date | 17 April 1925 |
Docket Number | (No. 8659.) |
Citation | 273 S.W. 874 |
Parties | BURRELL et al. v. MICHAUX et al. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Harris County; J. D. Harvey, Judge.
Suit by D. W. Michaux and others against A. H. Burrell and others.Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants appeal.Affirmed.
Wilford H. Smith and W. M. C. Dickson, both of Houston, and Denison, Watkins & White, of Chicago, Ill., for appellants.
Pollard, Berry & Fisher, John H. Crooker, and Geo. C. Gaines, Jr., all of Houston, for appellees.
With the interpolation of only a few words tending to greater distinctness, this general statement of the nature and result of the suit is adopted from the appellees' brief as being substantially correct:
In protest against that judgment, the parties so acting below in representation of both such local and national "Negro Shrine" organizations, and their officers and members, appeal to this court.
At the request of appellants, the trial court filed very full findings of fact and law.Those of fact materially embodying the history and present status in relation to each other of the two litigating bodies are these: Paragraphs V, VI, IX, X, XI, XII, XIII, XIV, and XVIII, as to the whites, as follows:
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Glass v. Kottwitz
...relief against a competing partnership organized by defendant to manufacture and sell substantially the same remedy under another name." The rule as to the use of generic names in such connection was declared by this court in
Burrell v. Michaux, supra, at page 880, par. 3, to "Even generic names and emblems will be so protected if there has been such a prior combination and association of them with, or application of them to, a new and distinctive enterprise that their subsequent usedefendant is wholly insolvent," etc. Assuming these averments to have been proved, as must be done in the absence of the evidence, the right to the writ awarded is upheld by these additional authorities: Burrell v. Michaux (Tex. Civ. App.) 273 S. W. 874, aff. (Tex. Com. App.) 286 S. W. 176; Luckett v. Orange Julep Co., 271 Mo. 289, 196 S. W. 740; Germo Mfg. Co. v. Combs, 209 Mo. App. 651, 240 S. W. 877; Alff v. Radam, 77 Tex. 530, 14 S. W. 164, 9 L. R. A. 145, 19averments to have been proved, as must be done in the absence of the evidence, the right to the writ awarded is upheld by these additional authorities: Burrell v. Michaux (Tex. Civ. App.) 273 S. W. 874, aff. (Tex. Com. App.) 286 S. W. 176; Luckett v. Orange Julep Co., 271 Mo. 289, 196 S. W. 740; Germo Mfg. Co. v. Combs, 209 Mo. App. 651, 240 S. W. 877; Alff v. Radam, 77 Tex. 530, 14 S. W. 164, 9 L. R. A. 145, 19 Am. St. Rep. 792; 38 Cyc. pp. 835, 836;... -
The Grand Temple, Etc. v. Independent Order, K. & D. of T.
...where one corporation seeks to benefit itself by the name of another. 7 R. C. L. p. 134. The above doctrine was followed in Burrell v. Michaux (Tex. Civ. App.) 273 S. W. 874, affirmed by the Commission of Appeals, same case,
286 S. W. 176. It is true that writ of certiorari was granted by the Supreme Court of the United States, and the judgment of the state courts was reversed, but only upon the finding that the plaintiff was guilty of obvious and long-continued laches, underdiffering only in degree. Similarity, and not identity, is the usual recourse where one corporation seeks to benefit itself by the name of another. 7 R. C. L. p. 134. The above doctrine was followed in Burrell v. Michaux (Tex. Civ. App.) 273 S. W. 874, affirmed by the Commission of Appeals, same case, 286 S. W. 176. It is true that writ of certiorari was granted by the Supreme Court of the United States, and the judgment of the state courts was reversed, but only upon the... -
Ancient Egyptian Arabic Order of Nobles of the Mystic Shrine v. Michaux
...practices and was not chargeable with laches in not taking earlier steps to stop them. The conclusions of law and the decree are copied in the margin.1 The decree was affirmed by the Court of Civil Ap- peals,
Burrell v. Michaux, 273 S. W. 874, and by the Supreme Court of the state, 286 S. W. 176. The negro order then petitioned this court for a review upon writ of certiorari, and the petition was granted. In the state appellate courts, the negro order relied on the Acttaking earlier steps to stop them. The conclusions of law and the decree are copied in the margin.1 The decree was affirmed by the Court of Civil Ap- peals, Burrell v. Michaux, 273 S. W. 874, and by the Supreme Court of the state, 286 S. W. 176. The negro order then petitioned this court for a review upon writ of certiorari, and the petition was In the state appellate courts, the negro order relied on the Act of Congress of May 5, 1870, and its incorporation thereunder, just... -
Burrell v. Michaux
...discussed), upon which he rendered judgment against the colored shrine according to the prayer of complainants' petition, and upon appeal by the defendants the Court of Civil Appeals for the First District affirmed that judgment.
273 S. W. 874. The Supreme Court, in view of the opinion of Chief Justice White in the case of Creswill v. Grand Lodge Knights of Pythias of Georgia, 225 U. S. 246, 32 S. Ct. 822, 56 L. Ed. 1074, granted the writ of error herein to review the The...