Burris, In re, 112

Decision Date24 February 1965
Docket NumberNo. 112,112
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court
PartiesIn re discharge of Rebert C. BURRIS by the City Manager, the Civil Service Commission and the City Council of the City of Asheville.

W. M. Styles, Asheville, for petitioner-appellant.

O. E. Starnes, Jr., Asheville, for the City of Asheville, respondent-appellee.

William J. Cocke, Asheville, for Civil Service Board of the City of Asheville, respondent-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner's assignments of error do not call into question the findings of fact made by the Civil Service Commission or the evidence on which they are based. This appeal presents only the question whether the facts found support Judge Clarkson's conclusions of law. Merrell v. Jenkins, 242 N.C. 636, 89 S.E.2d 242.

The findings of fact unequivocally disclose that petitioner knowingly and deliberately--and at an expenditure of considerable time and effort--brought about a conflict of interest between himself and his employer.

'Manifestly, when a servant becomes engaged in a business which necessarily renders him a competitor and rival of his master, no matter how much or how little time and attention he devotes to it, he has an interest against his duty. It would be monstrous to hold that the master is bound to retain the servant in his employment after he has thus voluntarily put himself in an attitude hostile to his master's interests.' Dieringer v. Meyer, 42 Wis. 311, 313, 24 Am.Rep. 415, 416.

Where an employee deliberately acquires an interest adverse to his employer, he is disloyal, and his discharge is justified. 3 Am.Jur.2d, Agency § 48 (1962).

The judgment of the court below is

Affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. v. Stein, 1:16CV25
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of North Carolina
    • June 12, 2020
    ... ... at 270 (quoting Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife , 504 U.S. 555, 561, 112 S.Ct. 2130, 119 L.Ed.2d 351 (1992) ). At the summary judgment stage, a plaintiff must "set forth by affidavit or other evidence specific facts, which ... Simpson's Beauty Supply, Inc. , 86 N.C.App. 451, 358 S.E.2d 107 (1987), and In re Burris , 263 N.C. 793, 140 S.E.2d 408 (1965) (per curiam), the court stated, "if McKnight and Burris indeed serve to define an employee's duty of ... ...
  • Dalton v. Camp
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • June 6, 2000
    ... ... 451, 453, 358 S.E.2d 107, 109 (1987) ... Where an employee deliberately acquires an interest adverse to his employer, he is disloyal. In Re Burris, 263 N.C. 793, 795, 140 S.E.2d 408, 410 (1965) ...         Plaintiff claims that summary judgment is inappropriate because there is a ... ...
  • Dalton v. Camp
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • July 20, 2001
    ... ... Simpson's Beauty Supply, 86 N.C.App. 451, 358 S.E.2d 107 (1987); In re Burris, 263 N.C. 793, 140 S.E.2d 408 (1965) (per curiam), even though those cases were devoid of claims or counterclaims alleging a breach of such duty. In ... ...
  • Dalton v. Camp, COA98-1330.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • September 21, 1999
    ... ... 451, 453, 358 S.E.2d 107, 109 (1987). Where an employee deliberately acquires an interest adverse to his employer, he is disloyal. In Re Burris, 263 N.C. 793, 795, 140 S.E.2d 408, 410 (1965) ...         Plaintiff claims that summary judgment is inappropriate because there is a ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT