Burroughs v. Leslie
| Decision Date | 23 April 1981 |
| Docket Number | No. 20815,20815 |
| Citation | 620 S.W.2d 643 |
| Parties | Edward L. BURROUGHS and Melba Burroughs, Appellants, v. Haskell Q. LESLIE, Appellee. |
| Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Samuel L. Boyd, McElroy & Boyd, Dallas, for appellants.
John H. Marks, Jr., James H. Moody, III, Strasburger & Price, Dallas, for appellee.
Before GUITTARD, C. J., and AKIN and CARVER, JJ.
The trial court rendered a summary judgment for defendants. On this appeal plaintiffs do not assert any error in the summary judgment, but contend that the trial court erred in vacating an earlier default judgment and granting a motion for new trial. Defendant moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the trial court's granting of a new trial is not subject to review. We overruled the motion to dismiss, but defendant has now moved for summary affirmance on the ground that appellants' brief presents nothing for review. We agree. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment without hearing oral argument or examining the briefs on the question of whether defendant presented sufficient grounds to vacate the default judgment.
Plaintiffs insist that the court had no power to vacate the default judgment unless grounds for a new trial are presented in accordance with the standards laid down in Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc., 134 Tex. 388, 133 S.W.2d 124 (1939). That case and other precedents cited by appellants establish certain requisites in determining whether the trial court erred in overruling a motion for new trial. They have never been applied to limit the trial court's power to grant a new trial within the period of the court's plenary power over its judgments.
Under rule 329b of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, as it was in force when the default judgment was vacated, the trial court retained jurisdiction over the cause and had plenary power over its judgment until thirty days after expiration of the time for overruling the motion for new trial, and within that time the court had power to vacate or modify the judgment or grant a new trial. Transamerican Leasing Co. v. Three Bears, Inc., 567 S.W.2d 799, 800 (Tex.1978). An order granting a new trial within that period is not subject to review either by direct appeal from that order, or from a final judgment rendered after further proceedings in the trial court. Silva v. Sentinel Life Ins. Co., 361 S.W.2d 731 (Tex.Civ.App. El Paso 1962, writ ref'd n. r. e.); Ebaugh v. State, 342 S.W.2d 221 (Tex.Civ.App. Austin 1961, writ ref'd n. r. e.); Equitable Life Assur. Soc'y v. Murdock, 219 S.W.2d 159 (Tex.Civ.App. El Paso 1949, writ ref'd n. r. e.). The court's plenary power over its judgments for the period specified in rule 329b is the same as that over an interlocutory judgment against one of several defendants, which in the absence of a severance, may be set aside as long as the suit against the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
In re Columbia Medical Center
...TEX. PROP.CODE § 111.004(12), there is no property interest in a particular non-final judgment, Burroughs v. Leslie, 620 S.W.2d 643, 644 (Tex. Civ.App.-Dallas 1981, writ ref'd n.r.e.). Furthermore, the Supreme Court has held that no property rights are implicated when a trial court makes a ......
-
Myers v. Emery
...proceedings in the trial court. Cummins v. Paisan Construction Co., 682 S.W.2d 235, 236 (Tex.1984); Burroughs v. Leslie, 620 S.W.2d 643, 644 (Tex.Civ.App.--Dallas 1981, writ ref'd n.r.e.). Myers also argues that the trial court erred in entering the order of dismissal for the reason that Em......
-
Otis Spunkmeyer Inc. v. Blakely
...235 (Tex. 1984); Lamberti v. Tschoepe, 776 S.W.2d 651, 652 (Tex. App.-Dallas 1989, writ denied); Burroughs v. Leslie, 620 S.W.2d 643, 644 (Tex. Civ. App.-Dallas 1981, writ ref'd n.r.e.). Therefore, we overrule Spunkmeyer's seventh II. Jury Findings Regarding Proximate Cause In its first iss......
-
Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. Brown
...Cummins v. Paisan Construction Company, 682 S.W.2d 235 (Tex.1984). Our Supreme Court in Cummins, citing Burroughs v. Leslie, 620 S.W.2d 643 (Tex.Civ.App.--Dallas 1981, writ ref'd n.r.e.), stated: The motion for new trial was timely filed and the court granted the motion during its period of......