Burry v. Madison Park Owner Llc
Decision Date | 31 May 2011 |
Citation | 924 N.Y.S.2d 77,2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 04530,84 A.D.3d 699 |
Parties | Brian T. BURRY, et al., Plaintiffs–Appellants–Respondents,v.MADISON PARK OWNER LLC, Defendant–Respondent–Appellant. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Moulinos & Associates LLC, New York (Peter Moulinos of counsel), for appellants-respondents.Troutman Sanders LLP, New York (Matthew J. Aaronson and Adam S. Libove of counsel), for respondent-appellant.MAZZARELLI, J.P., FRIEDMAN, CATTERSON, MANZANET–DANIELS, ROMÁN, JJ.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Saliann Scarpulla, J.), entered July 14, 2010, which, to the extent appealed, granted defendant's motion to dismiss the fourth cause of action, for breach of fiduciary duty, pursuant to CPLR 3016(b) and 3211(a)(7), and denied defendant's motion to dismiss the first cause of action, for breach of contract, pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(1), unanimously affirmed, without costs.
To state a claim for breach of fiduciary duty, plaintiffs must allege that (1) defendant owed them a fiduciary duty, (2) defendant committed misconduct, and (3) they suffered damages caused by that misconduct ( see RNK Capital LLC v. Natsource LLC, 76 A.D.3d 840, 841–842, 907 N.Y.S.2d 476 [2010], lv. denied 16 N.Y.3d 709, 2011 WL 1237542 [2011]; Rut v. Young Adult Inst., Inc., 74 A.D.3d 776, 777, 901 N.Y.S.2d 715 [2010]; PJI 3:59, Comment). At least two essential elements have not been sufficiently pleaded. Plaintiffs have not cited any authority for imposing a fiduciary duty upon defendant, a condominium sponsor, for the benefit of plaintiffs, potential unit purchasers. In addition, plaintiffs' allegations of “misconduct” on the part of defendant are in essence claims of fraud that have not been pleaded with particularity ( see CPLR 3016[b] ).
Supreme Court properly determined that defendant failed to meet its burden as the movant on its motion to dismiss the first cause of action, for breach of contract, pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(1), because the very documentary evidence upon which defendant's motion is premised undermines its entitlement to dismissal. There is no fair construction of paragraph 14 of the purchase agreements that would limit the circumstances under which plaintiffs could seek cancellation. Defendant's argument that paragraph 14 creates a condition precedent to plaintiffs' election of the remedy of cancellation is untenable and wholly unsupported by its plain language.
We have considered the remaining...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ubs Fin. Servs., Inc. v. Aliberti
...party] committed misconduct, and (3) [the plaintiff] suffered damages caused by that misconduct." Burry v. Madison Park Owner LLC, 84 A.D.3d 699, 700, 924 N.Y.S.2d 77 (N.Y.A.D. 2011). Accord NRT New York, LLC v. Morin, 147 A.D.3d 589, 589, 48 N.Y.S.3d 56 (N.Y.A.D. 2017). In both New York an......
-
Bank of N.Y. Mellon Trust Co. v. Solstice ABS CBO II, Ltd.
...to [defendant's] production and sale of trademarked products during the Relevant Period.”); Burry v. Madison Park Owner LLC, 84 A.D.3d 699, 700, 924 N.Y.S.2d 77, 78 (1st Dep't 2011) (“Defendant's argument that paragraph 14 creates a condition precedent to plaintiffs' election of the remedy ......
-
Marc Lester, Marc Lester Antiques & Brocante, LLC v. Michael Capo, Kenneth Rosenblum, Jerome Mazzeo, & Beaux-Arts Auction, LLC
...that the attempt to withdraw $70,000 caused any damage to the Company, a necessary element of both claims. See Burry v. Madison Park Owner LLC, 84 A.D.3d 699, 700 (2011) (breach of fiduciary duty claim requires pleading damages); see also Kaufman, 307 A.D.2d at 125 (a claim for aiding and a......
-
v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon, the Bank of N.Y. Mellon Corp.
...(2) defendant committed misconduct, and (3) they suffered damages caused by that misconduct.” ( Burry v. Madison Park Owner LLC, 84 A.D.3d 699, 699–700, 924 N.Y.S.2d 77 [1st Dept.2011];Rut v. Young Adult Inst., Inc., 74 A.D.3d 776, 777, 901 N.Y.S.2d 715 [2d Dept.2010].) It is well settled t......