Burton v. Peace, 495.
Decision Date | 28 February 1934 |
Docket Number | No. 495.,495. |
Citation | 206 N.C. 99,173 S.E. 4 |
Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Parties | BURTON . v. PEACE et al. |
Appeal from Superior Court, Guilford County; Stack, Judge.
Action by Alma Peace Burton against John Peace and wife and another. Judgment in favor of the plaintiff, and the defendants appeal.
Affirmed.
Mary Elizabeth Peace, mother of plaintiff, was the owner of certain land in High Point township for many years prior to November 13, 1929. She lived at her homeplace and on said date it was alleged that "she was removed from her homeplace by her son, the defendant, John Peace, " and lived in his home until her death, intestate, on December 27, 1931. She left surviving the following children and only heirs at law: J. A. Peace, C. L. Peace, Alma Peace Burton, and John Peace. She had no other property except the real estate in controversy. At the time of her death the deceased was 79 years of age. On the 26th day of November, 1930, Mary Elizabeth Peace signed a paper writing purporting to be a deed for said land, in which Minnie Peace, the wife of the defendant J. A. Peace, was named grantee.
The plaintiff instituted this action to re cover a one-fourth undivided interest in the land and to set aside the deed. She offered evidence that her mother had been totally blind for ten years, previous to her death, and that she was weak, nervous, and not capable of taking care of herself.
The deed was recorded on December 31, 1931, after the death of the grantor. The plaintiff offered the deed for the purpose of attack. There was evidence offered by the defendant tending to show that the deceased, although blind and old, was intelligent and of sound mind and memory until shortly before her death.
The only evidence with respect to the execution and delivery of the deed is contained in the testimony of J. M. Davis, a notary public, who took the acknowledgment of Mary Elizabeth Peace. He said:
The trial judge inquired of attorneys for the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ballard v. Ballard
... ... due execution of the * * * deed' before W. L. Hensley, a ... justice of the peace of Madison County, and was recorded in ... the office of the Register of Deeds of Madison County ... Blades v. Wilmington Trust ... Co., 207 N.C. 771, 178 S.E. 565; Burton v ... Peace, 206 N.C. 99, 173 S.E. 4; Gulley v ... Smith, 203 N.C. 274, 165 S.E. 710; Gillespie ... ...
-
Johnson v. Johnson
...cited in the opinion, was not necessary to the decision, and constituted an obiter dictum. 21 C.J.S., Courts, s 190. In Burton v. Peace [206 N.C. 99, 173 S.E. 5], defendant was not content to rest on the rebuttable presumption of execution raised by the probate and registration. He undertoo......
-
Williams v. North Carolina State Bd. of Ed.
...Carolina. Jones v. Saunders, 254 N.C. 644, 119 S.E.2d 789 (1961); Elliott v. Goss, 250 N.C. 185, 108 S.E.2d 475 (1959); Burton v. Peace, 206 N.C. 99, 173 S.E. 4 (1934); 3 Strong, N.C. Index 2d, Deeds § 7 (1967). A deed takes effect from the time of its actual delivery. Kendrick v. Dellinger......
-
Carland v. Allison
...and it was necessary for them to offer it for attack to have something at which to strike. This is the accepted practice. Burton v. Peace, 206 N.C. 99, 173 S.E. 4. was ample and persuasive evidence of the mental incompetency of the grantor. This alone would defeat defendant's general motion......