Burwell v. Sollock
Decision Date | 06 November 1895 |
Parties | BURWELL et al. v. SOLLOCK et al. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from district court, La Salle county; M. F. Lowe, Judge.
Action by G. W. Sollock and another against H. A. Burwell and others to rescind a contract for the sale of land. From a judgment annulling the contract, and offsetting the rents against the value of the improvements, defendants appeal. Modified.
E. R. Lane, for appellants. Lewy & Sehorn, for appellees.
Conclusions of Fact.
The following contract was entered into on June 27, 1891:
We find that the $500 cash payment was made, and Mrs. H. A. Burwell did not perform the agreement on her part at the time specified (January 1, 1892), because unavoidably prevented from being able to give a good title in respect to one of the surveys (survey 576), a school section, for which application for purchase had been made. We find from plaintiff Sollock's testimony that in April, 1892, he told her that he would wait for her to get this patent until after the May term of the district court, and, about three or...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Bourland v. Huffhines
...cases cited by the author in support of these principles show that they are practically universal; among them being Burwell v. Sollock (Tex. Civ. App.) 32 S. W. 844, Roos v. Thigpen (Tex. Civ. App.) 140 S. W. 1180, and Clifton v. Charles, 53 Tex. Civ. App. 448, 116 S. W. 120, decided by the......
-
Mays v. Blair
...262; 46 Hun 839; 41 Id. 311; 120 N.Y. 79; 10 Ill. 174; 5 La. 845; 64 Md. 543; 117 Mass. 184; 24 Ark. 197; 8 N.J.Eq. 520; 3 A. 821; 32 S.W. 844; 63 Ark. 548, and cited; 44 Ark. 145; 66 Ark. 433. 3. Appellant had the right to demand that appellee would be in position to comply with his contra......
-
Stinson v. Sneed
...21 Tex. 370), or because Sneed was unable to convey a marketable title, in the absence of fraud or willful refusal on his part (Burwell v. Sollock, 32 S. W. 844); but, in the latter event, Stinson would be entitled to offset, against Sneed's claim for use and occupation, the value of his im......
-
Morton v. Hung Nguyen
...in event of rescinded contract for deed; fact question remained on issue of rescission and directed verdict was improper); Burwell v. Sollock, 32 S.W. 844, 846 (Tex.Civ.App.1895, no writ) (party entitled to value of other party's possession of land subject to annulled contract for deed). An......