Bush v. Alabama Dept. of Corrections

Decision Date02 November 2007
Docket Number1051342.
Citation985 So.2d 399
PartiesMelvin Ross BUSH v. ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS.
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

Melvin Ross Bush, pro se.

Kim T. Thomas, gen. counsel, and Greg Biggs, asst. atty. gen. and asst. gen. counsel, Department of Corrections, for appellee.

SEE, Justice.

Melvin Ross Bush's appeal was originally filed with the Court of Civil Appeals. That court transferred the appeal to this Court on the basis that it lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over Bush's appeal. In an opinion released on September 28, 2007, Collins v. Alabama Department of Corrections, 982 So.2d 1078 (Ala.2007), this Court overruled Block v. Alabama Department of Corrections, 923 So.2d 342 (Ala.Crim. App.2005); Beck v. Alabama Board of Pardons & Paroles, 907 So.2d 1096 (Ala. Crim.App.2005); Jacobs v. Alabama Department of Corrections, 900 So.2d 485 (Ala. Crim.App.2004); Collins v. Alabama Department of Corrections, 911 So.2d 739, 743 (Ala.Crim.App.2004); McConico v. Alabama Department of Corrections, 893 So.2d 577 (Ala.Crim.App.2004); and Boykins v. State, 862 So.2d 594 (Ala.Crim.App. 2003), to the extent that these cases hold that the Court of Criminal Appeals "`would have jurisdiction to review certiorari petitions challenging [Alabama Department of Correction] actions involving an inmate's conduct [while incarcerated], while the Court of Civil Appeals would have jurisdiction to review petitions challenging decisions based on factors other than the inmate's conduct [while incarcerated].'" Collins, 982 So.2d at 1081 (quoting McConico, 893 So.2d at 581 n. 5). We also held in Collins that the Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction to review all certiorari petitions challenging actions by the Department of Corrections, "regardless of when the relevant conduct of the inmate occurred." 982 So.2d at 1081. Based on our decision in Collins, we transfer Bush's appeal to the Court of Criminal Appeals.

APPEAL TRANSFERRED.

WOODALL, SMITH, BOLIN, and PARKER, JJ., concur.

COBB, C.J., and MURDOCK, J., recuse themselves.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT