Butler County v. Boatmen's Bank
Decision Date | 23 February 1898 |
Citation | 143 Mo. 13,44 S.W. 1047 |
Parties | BUTLER COUNTY v. BOATMEN'S BANK. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from St. Louis circuit court.
Action by Butler county against the Boatmen's Bank. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals. Reversed.
W. E. Renfro and E. R. Lentz, for appellant. Boyle, Priest & Lehmann, for respondent.
This is an action to recover a balance of $6,722.50, alleged to be due the county of Butler from defendant, a savings bank, on account of a special deposit therein of the sum of $30,933 cash. The petition charges, in substance, that on the 1st day of March, 1890, the plaintiff deposited with the defendant $30,000 of its new 5 per cent. funding bonds, with instructions in writing to the defendant, among other things, to deliver them to Wernse & Dieckman for their face value in cash, and to apply the cash so to be received to the payment of certain 6 per cent. bonds which were on that day said to have been due and payable at the defendant bank. The petition further says that the defendant did deliver said bonds to Wernse & Dieckman, and did receive therefor $30,000; and, further, that the defendant has wholly failed, neglected, and refused to apply the whole of said $30,000 to the payment of said 6 per cent. bonds; and that the defendant has wholly failed, neglected, and refused to account to plaintiff for the amount which it so failed to pay for said 6 per cent. bonds; and plaintiff asks judgment for said balance. There is a second count in the petition, but no claim is now made under it. The answer is a general denial and a plea of payment. The reply is a denial of new matter.
It appears from the evidence that on the 8th day of February, 1890, the county court of Butler county, pursuant to previous steps regularly taken, made and entered of record an order for funding some of its outstanding 6 per cent. bonds, and for the issuance of $30,000 new bonds, bearing 5 per cent. interest. The order, after providing for issuing, signing, and registering the new bonds, appointed Martin Ferguson, county treasurer, as financial agent of the county, and gave him specific authority to enter into a contract on behalf of the county with Wernse & Dieckman, of St. Louis, to furnish the $30,000 necessary to redeem the old bonds. The terms of the instructions to the said Ferguson as financial agent required him to deliver the new bonds to defendant, to be delivered by it to Wernse & Dieckman The order further provided that the deposit of said bonds by Ferguson should be accompanied with the following letter of instruction to defendant: On the 26th day of February, 1890, said county court made the following additional order: The bonds and a certified copy of these orders were delivered to Ferguson. On the 1st day of March, 1890, the bonds were delivered to the cashier of defendant bank at its place of business in St. Louis. Whether or not the orders of the county court and the letter of instruction were delivered or shown to defendant's cashier is a disputed question. The cashier claims that neither was done. On receipt of the bonds the cashier prepared and Ferguson signed the following letter: The advertisement referred to in the letter is as follows: The cashier thereupon delivered to Ferguson the following letter: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Moller-Vandenboom Lbr. Co. v. Boudreau
...therewith, and that plaintiff is also entitled to all reasonable inferences arising out of the testimony. [Butler County v. Boatmen's Bank, 143 Mo. 13, 44 S.W. 1047; Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Ward, 197 Mo. App. 286, 195 S.W. 75; Vincent v. Means, 184 Mo. 327, loc. cit. 341-343, 82 S.W. ......
-
Moller-Vandenboom Lumber Co. v. Boudreau
... ... Pitts, 100 S.W. 1047, 201 Mo ... 356, (q) 359; Henson v. Perry County Sav. & Loan ... Assn., 300 S.W. 1037, (q) 1038 (cited and quoted with ... 3 given at the request of defendant Boudreau ... Stotts City Bank v. T. A. Miller Lumber Co., 74 S.W ... 472, 102 Mo.App. 75; Geo. C ... reasonable inferences arising out of the testimony ... [ Butler County v. Boatmen's Bank, 143 Mo. 13, 44 ... S.W. 1047; Goodyear Tire & ... ...
-
Central States Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. U.S. Fidelity & Guar. Co.
...declarations complained of was reversible error. De Graw v. Prior, 53 Mo. 313; Lumber Co. v. Christophel, 62 Mo.App. 98; Butler County v. Boatmen's Bank, 143 Mo. 13; Vincent v. Means, 184 Mo. 327; Crossett Ferrill, 209 Mo. 704; Eaton v. Cates, 175 S.W. 950; Bartlett v. Boyd, 175 S.W. 947; G......
-
Swanson, Inc. v. Central Sur. & Ins. Corp.
... ... Savs. & Loan Assn ... v. U.S. Fid. & Guar. Co., 66 S.W.2d 550; Butler ... County v. Boatmen's Bank, 143 Mo. 23, 44 S.W. 1049; ... Crossett ... ...