BVS, Inc. v. CDW Direct, LLC

Decision Date28 March 2013
Docket NumberNo. 11–CV–79–LRR.,11–CV–79–LRR.
PartiesBVS, INC., Plaintiff, v. CDW DIRECT, LLC, Defendant and Third–Party Plaintiff, v. Arrow Electronics, Inc., TSSLink, Inc. and Net App, Inc., Third–Party Defendants. Net App, Inc., Counter Claimant, v. CDW Direct, LLC, Counter Defendant.
CourtU.S. District Court — Northern District of Iowa

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Vernon Pellett Squires, Natalie K. Ditmars, Bradley and Riley PC, Cedar Rapids, IA, for Plaintiff.

Dana L. Oxley, Kevin J. Caster, Theresa C. Davis, Shuttleworth & Ingersoll, Cedar Rapids, IA, for Defendant and Third–Party Plaintiff.

Gregory M. Lederer, Brenda K. Wallrichs, Lederer Weston Craig PLC, Cedar Rapids, IA, for Third–Party Defendants.

Donald G. Heeman, Matthew D. Schwandt, Felhaber, Larson, Fenlon & Vogt, PA, Minneapolis, MN, Richard A. Stefani, Gray, Stefani & Mitvalsky, PLC, Cedar Rapids, IA, for Counter Claimant.

ORDER

LINDA R. READE, Chief Judge.

+-------------------+
                ¦TABLE OF CONTENTS  ¦
                +-------------------¦
                ¦                   ¦
                +-------------------+
                
+----------------------------------------------------------------+
                ¦I.   ¦INTRODUCTION                                       ¦1016  ¦
                +-----+---------------------------------------------------+------¦
                ¦     ¦                                                   ¦      ¦
                +-----+---------------------------------------------------+------¦
                ¦II.  ¦PROCEDURAL HISTORY                                 ¦1016  ¦
                +----------------------------------------------------------------+
                
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                ¦      ¦A.  ¦Arrow Motion                                            ¦1017   ¦
                +------+----+--------------------------------------------------------+-------¦
                ¦      ¦B.  ¦CDW Motion                                              ¦1017   ¦
                +------+----+--------------------------------------------------------+-------¦
                ¦      ¦C.  ¦Net App Motion                                          ¦1017   ¦
                +------+----+--------------------------------------------------------+-------¦
                ¦      ¦D.  ¦TSSLink Motion                                          ¦1017   ¦
                +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                ¦      ¦                                                             ¦       ¦
                +------+-------------------------------------------------------------+-------¦
                ¦III.  ¦SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION                                  ¦1018   ¦
                +------+-------------------------------------------------------------+-------¦
                ¦      ¦                                                             ¦       ¦
                +------+-------------------------------------------------------------+-------¦
                ¦IV.   ¦SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARD                                    ¦1018   ¦
                +------+-------------------------------------------------------------+-------¦
                ¦      ¦                                                             ¦       ¦
                +------+-------------------------------------------------------------+-------¦
                ¦V.    ¦RELEVANT FACTUAL BACKGROUND                                  ¦1018   ¦
                +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                ¦      ¦A.  ¦Parties                                                 ¦1018   ¦
                +------+----+--------------------------------------------------------+-------¦
                ¦      ¦B.  ¦Course of Dealing Between BVS and CDW                   ¦1019   ¦
                +------+----+--------------------------------------------------------+-------¦
                ¦      ¦C.  ¦SAN Project Design                                      ¦1019   ¦
                +------+----+--------------------------------------------------------+-------¦
                ¦      ¦D.  ¦Contract Formation                                      ¦1020   ¦
                +------+----+--------------------------------------------------------+-------¦
                ¦      ¦E.  ¦Installation and Implementation                         ¦1022   ¦
                +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                
+----------------------------------------------------------------+
                ¦     ¦                                                   ¦      ¦
                +-----+---------------------------------------------------+------¦
                ¦VI.  ¦CDW MOTION                                         ¦1023  ¦
                +----------------------------------------------------------------+
                
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                ¦      ¦A.  ¦Breach of Contract Claim                                ¦1023   ¦
                +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                ¦      ¦    ¦1.  ¦What are the terms of the contract?                 ¦1024  ¦
                +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                ¦     ¦   ¦   ¦a.  ¦Are the Terms and Conditions part of the contract?  ¦1024  ¦
                +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                ¦     ¦   ¦   ¦   ¦i.    ¦Parties' arguments                         ¦1024   ¦
                +-----+---+---+---+------+-------------------------------------------+-------¦
                ¦     ¦   ¦   ¦   ¦ii.   ¦Applicable law                             ¦1024   ¦
                +-----+---+---+---+------+-------------------------------------------+-------¦
                ¦     ¦   ¦   ¦   ¦iii.  ¦Application                                ¦1026   ¦
                +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                ¦      ¦    ¦   ¦b.  ¦Are oral promises part of the contract?         ¦1027  ¦
                +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                ¦     ¦   ¦   ¦   ¦i.    ¦Parties' arguments                         ¦1027   ¦
                +-----+---+---+---+------+-------------------------------------------+-------¦
                ¦     ¦   ¦   ¦   ¦ii.   ¦Applicable law                             ¦1028   ¦
                +-----+---+---+---+------+-------------------------------------------+-------¦
                ¦     ¦   ¦   ¦   ¦iii.  ¦Application                                ¦1029   ¦
                +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                ¦      ¦    ¦2.  ¦Did CDW breach the contract?                        ¦1030  ¦
                +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                ¦      ¦B.  ¦Unjust Enrichment Claim                                 ¦1030   ¦
                +------+----+--------------------------------------------------------+-------¦
                ¦      ¦C.  ¦Breach of Warranty Claims                               ¦1031   ¦
                +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                ¦      ¦    ¦1.  ¦Parties' arguments                                  ¦1031  ¦
                +------+----+----+----------------------------------------------------+------¦
                ¦      ¦    ¦2.  ¦Application                                         ¦1032  ¦
                +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                ¦      ¦D.  ¦Fraud and Fraudulent Nondisclosure Claims               ¦1033   ¦
                +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                ¦      ¦    ¦1.  ¦Parties' arguments                                  ¦1033  ¦
                +------+----+----+----------------------------------------------------+------¦
                ¦      ¦    ¦2.  ¦Applicable law                                      ¦1034  ¦
                +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                ¦      ¦    ¦   ¦a.  ¦Effect of integration clause                    ¦1034  ¦
                +------+----+---+----+------------------------------------------------+------¦
                ¦      ¦    ¦   ¦b.  ¦Fraud pleading requirements                     ¦1034  ¦
                +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                ¦      ¦    ¦3.  ¦Fraud claim                                         ¦1035  ¦
                +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                ¦      ¦    ¦   ¦a.  ¦Timing of installation and implementation       ¦1035  ¦
                +------+----+---+----+------------------------------------------------+------¦
                ¦      ¦    ¦   ¦b.  ¦CDW's technical competency                      ¦1036  ¦
                +------+----+---+----+------------------------------------------------+------¦
                ¦      ¦    ¦   ¦c.  ¦Replication                                     ¦1036  ¦
                +------+----+---+----+------------------------------------------------+------¦
                ¦      ¦    ¦   ¦d.  ¦World–class solution                          ¦1037  ¦
                +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                ¦      ¦    ¦4.  ¦Fraudulent nondisclosure claim                      ¦1037  ¦
                +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                ¦      ¦    ¦   ¦a.  ¦Applicable law                                  ¦1037  ¦
                +------+----+---+----+------------------------------------------------+------¦
                ¦      ¦    ¦
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Cordova v. Univ. of Notre Dame Du Lac
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Indiana
    • March 29, 2013
  • Dumont Tel. Co. v. Power & Tel. Supply Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Iowa
    • August 26, 2013
    ...as written confirmations even if a contract has already been formed before the invoice is created. See BVS, Inc. v. CDW Direct, LLC, 936 F.Supp.2d 1013, 1023–24, 1026–28 (N.D.Iowa 2013) (enforcing a new term in an invoice sent as a written confirmation days after the parties' offer and acce......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT