Byars v. City of Griffin
Decision Date | 14 February 1929 |
Docket Number | 6585. |
Parties | BYARS v. CITY OF GRIFFIN et al. |
Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Syllabus by the Court.
Under the pleadings and the evidence in this case, a controlling question is whether the obligations of the city, outlined in the proposed contract set forth in the petition, would amount to the creation of a debt, within the meaning of that clause in article 7, § 7, par. 1, of the Constitution of this state (Civil Code 1910, § 6563), which declares: "The debt hereafter incurred by any county, municipal corporation, or political division of this state, except as in this constitution provided for, shall not exceed seven per centum of the assessed value of all the taxable property therein."
Upon a proper construction of the proposed contract, giving due consideration to its substance and looking to the intention of the parties as revealed from the paper in its entirety the obligations of the city would amount to the creation of a debt within the meaning of the above-quoted provision of the constitution. In view of this ruling, it is unnecessary to deal with other questions of law involved in the case.
It was erroneous to refuse a temporary injunction.
Error from Superior Court, Spalding County; W. E. H. Searcy, Jr. Judge.
Suit for injunction by C. A. Byars against the City of Griffin and others. To review a judgment refusing an injunction plaintiff brings error. Reversed.
Obligations of city under contract for construction of waterworks created "debt," within provision limiting debt to 7 per cent. of taxable property. Const. art. 7, § 7, par. 1.
The city of Griffin owned and operated a system of public utilities, embracing electric light, water, and sewerage plants. The growth of the city was such as to demand a greater water supply for promotion of health and safety of property. A sufficient water supply could be obtained by the construction of a pumping and transmission system at Flint river. Plans were prepared for construction of such a system, and an estimate was made of the cost of the improvement. The city had a certain amount of available funds on hand, but not sufficient to cover the cost of the improvement. It desired to use a certain portion of this amount, but the balance necessary to pay the cost of the improvement was such as, when added to the outstanding bonded indebtedness of the city, would exceed 7 per cent. of the assessed value of all the taxable property therein. In these circumstances certain citizens of Griffin applied to the judge of the superior court and obtained a charter for incorporation of the Griffin Waterworks Company. The capital stock was $100,000, divided into 10 shares of common stock, of the par value of $100 each; said stock to be issued and held upon the following conditions:
The board of commissioners of the city of Griffin, created under the Act approved August 20, 1917 (Acts 1917, p. 677), adopted an ordinance calling an election for the purpose of determining whether the city of Griffin will make and enter into a contract with the Griffin Waterworks Company. Omitting section 11 and the attesting clause, the proposed contract was as follows:
Principal. Interest. Total.
To continue reading
Request your trial