C. Aultman & Co. v. Patterson

Citation14 N.W. 804,14 Neb. 57
PartiesC. AULTMAN & CO., PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEES, v. P. C. PATTERSON ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND APPELLANTS
Decision Date01 January 1883
CourtSupreme Court of Nebraska

MOTION to quash the bill of exceptions.

MOTION SUSTAINED.

H. J. Evans, for the motion.

Sibbett & Fuller, contra.

OPINION

BY THE COURT

This cause is submitted to the court on a motion to quash the bill of exceptions. First, because it was not filed in the district court; and, second, because there is no certificate of the clerk attached to the same. The bill was signed by the judge and was ordered to be made a part of the record in the cause, and there is no evidence before the court that it was not properly filed. The first objection therefore is untenable. The second objection is more serious. The statute permits the original bill to be filed in this court, but requires the clerk to certify that it is the original bill. This requirement cannot be dispensed with, but the court on proper application will permit the bill to be withdrawn for the purpose of having the certificate attached if desired. The motion must be sustained.

MOTION SUSTAINED.

To continue reading

Request your trial
20 cases
  • Fitzgerald v. Fitzgerald & Mallory Construction Co.
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Nebraska
    • 26 d2 Junho d2 1894
    ...10 Neb. 611, 7 N.W. 275; Courtnay v. Price, 12 Neb. 188, 10 N.W. 698; Jennings v. Simpson, 12 Neb. 558, 11 N.W. 880; Aultman v. Patterson, 14 Neb. 57, 14 N.W. 804; McLaughlin v. Sandusky, 17 Neb. 110, 22 N.W. 241.)" A patient and careful examination of all the testimony adduced upon the tri......
  • Romberg v. Fokken
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Nebraska
    • 18 d2 Fevereiro d2 1896
    ...thereof, as required by law. The pretended bill, therefore, must be ignored, and cannot be considered for any purpose. Aultman v. Patterson, 14 Neb. 57, 15 N. W. 350; Hogan v. O'Niel, 17 Neb. 641, 24 N. W. 213;Flynn v. Jordan, 17 Neb. 518, 23 N. W. 519. But it may be said the omissionof the......
  • Tecumseh Nat. Bank v. Saunders
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Nebraska
    • 3 d4 Junho d4 1897
    ...bill was not attached to the bills in the other cases or filed therein. Credit Foncier of America v. Rogers, 8 Neb. 34;Aultman v. Patterson, 14 Neb. 57, 14 N. W. 804;State Ins. Co. of Des Moines v. Buckstaff Bros. Manuf'g Co., 47 Neb. 1, 66 N. W. 27;Machine Co. v. Gerhold, 47 Neb. 397, 66 N......
  • Tecumseh National Bank v. Saunders
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Nebraska
    • 3 d4 Junho d4 1897
    ...... to the bills in the other cases or filed therein. ( Credit. Foncier of America v. Rogers , 8 Neb. 34; Aultman v. Patterson , 14 Neb. 57, 14 N.W. 804; State Ins. Co. of Des Moines v. Buckstaff , 47 Neb. 1; Wood Mowing & Reaping Machine Co. v. Gerhold , 47 ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT