C.H. v. State, 88-700
| Decision Date | 19 September 1989 |
| Docket Number | No. 88-700,88-700 |
| Parties | C.H., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Beth C. Weitzner, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Patricia A. Ash, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and JORGENSON and LEVY, JJ.
C.H. appeals from an adjudication of delinquency. For the following reason, we reverse.
In December, 1987, an Opa-locka police officer was called to a retail store to investigate C.H.'s presentation of a "questionable" one-hundred dollar bill. The officer observed a large bulge in C.H.'s back pants pocket, conducted a pat-down, and removed a metal cigarette case. The case was approximately 1/2 inch deep, 2 1/2 inches wide, and 3 1/2 inches long. The officer opened the case to check for possible weapons and found a razor blade and rock cocaine. C.H. was arrested and charged with narcotics violations. After hearing the officer's testimony regarding his search of C.H., the trial court denied C.H.'s motion to suppress the cigarette case as the result of an illegal search. Defense counsel initially stated that C.H. would enter a nolo contendere plea but then indicated that the ruling on the motion to suppress was dispositive and that the defense would rest. Upon the evidence presented at the suppression hearing, the trial court found and adjudicated C.H. delinquent.
The trial court erred in denying C.H.'s motion to suppress the physical evidence seized. Although the bulge in C.H.'s pocket initially may have given rise to a reasonable suspicion that the suspect was armed, see State v. Ramos, 378 So.2d 1294 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979) (), that reasonable suspicion disappeared once the officer determined that the object in the pocket was a cigarette case and not a weapon. There was no evidence presented that the officer had a reasonable suspicion that the cigarette case contained any kind of weapon; the search cannot be justified on the basis that a razor blade was found inside the case. See Schnick v. State, 362 So.2d 423 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978) (). Moreover, "[a] razor blade, like a nail file, keys or hat pin,...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Harford v. State, 1D01-1651.
...suppress marijuana found when officer opened and inspected a Marlboro cigarette box removed from person's pocket, citing C.H. v. State, 548 So.2d 895 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)). The state attempts to distinguish this case from others finding a search invalid by pointing to the dispatch report indi......
-
Do v. Geico Gen. Ins. Co.
... ... under section 627.428, Florida Statutes, has been litigated and is now well settled in the State of Florida.” Avila v. Latin Am. Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 548 So.2d 894, 894 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989) ... ...
-
People v. Baca
...in opening plastic vial wrapped with tape that measured three inches by one and one-half inches by one-half inch]; C.H. v. State (Fla.Dist.Ct.App. 1989) 548 So.2d 895, 896 [no reasonable suspicion that cigarette case contained any kind of weapon]; State v. James (La. 2000) 795 So.2d1146, 11......
-
RR v. State, 5D01-982.
...is not a concealed weapon unless it is used in a threatening manner so that it might be considered deadly. See also C.H. v. State, 548 So.2d 895 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). We agree, however, with the distinction made in Sims v. State, 688 So.2d 337 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996), between an ordinary razor bla......